Which, with any luck, might make demonstrating the issue easier than it is currently.
Its just determining a methodology for proving there is an issue, or spelunking in the code and demonstrating the cause.
Probably wouldnt hurt to have a formal and more detailed explanation on how IR signatures work. Gunjob got the basic run down before, but it wasnt overly clear.
That, I fully plan to do some butt kicking for if its wrong. But I’ve had moderate amount of success bug reporting HUD related issues, so im not overly worried so long as the issues are easily replicable.
Im desparetely hoping that the reason for not giving them it was due to the lack of proper HUD for it and now it has the actual HUD (with an A2A mode) we’ll finally see the full EEGS.
If they don’t give them that I’ll be very disappointed.
From a generic standpoint if someone passed of an E-M diagram about the F-15 pulling 1.5-2G less than It should that would have been changed immediately like next day they would be working on it. The Harrier though, they do nothing.
Not many people actually play the Shar to be fair.