If they are sensible, it will be the pylons that can only carry AAMs.
This being Gaijin… Who knows
(its not on dev yet)
1 Like
im going too assume the 2nd pylons, since the harrier II for the uk has those as the dedicated pylons for missiles (the one with the wing landing leg behind it)
probably should ask smin then lmao
@Smin1080p_WT sorry to bother you, but do you happen to know what stations BOL is to be equipped on?
1 Like
we are indeed, so back!
1 Like
I’d like to hope it’s the missile only pylon
Why do they look so different (Other than the obvious)
They should redo the file image for it to make it look like the GR.7
i think its the height of the cockpit making the T.10 angled a bit more?
TAV-8B skin for the T.10 so we can recreate this masterpiece
they’ve changed where they project light from when taking tt images, it’s not consistent at the best of times, but in general for aircraft the light used to come from the back right, where as lately the light is more front left
Amazing news, now that it will be usable (to an extent for the love of god fix the IR sig) I’m buying the thing.
BOL + Harrier FM buffs (even if they still aren’t correct) will make this thing pretty good.
1 Like
I don’t like it
This is where all the Brits buying the T.10 causes Gaijins servers to crash 🤣
me either. The Tail just becomes a black void, the Tornado GR.4, EFT, F-15E/I, SU-33/4, & all the Thai planes have the same problem. Pretty much anything new.
Thanks smin, Preorder en route
1 Like
It’s now received 2x bol so 320 extra countermeasures
2 Likes
Well, lads! I think I was quite late for pre-ordering, but not that late before departure. did I?
XD
Only thing that’s got me hyped for the update tbh, can’t wait to get my hands on a Harrier 2 with a decent BR
2 Likes
Lol its not going to be fun
doesn’t matter how many counter measures you get they are going to do zilch the Harriers are so stupidly hot this update its ridiculous.
throttle back dumb 50% of your flares and still only dodge the R-60 because you bleed its energy.
As a joke, please don’t break my mood sir. :P
Anyway, Can’t wait to see Harrier’s heat-sig also get fixed somewhere in future.
Just like what we got BOL here.
Someone told us that ‘To err is human.’ right?
Just… it seems Gaijin makes too many errors against harrier :|
It gets worse
Gaijin Lies x (to many times to count.)
1: The 110% rating (Short Lift wet) was never used to measure performance data IRL as it was too risky
2: the documents in the AV-8B SAC would use “Max Thrust rating” a real thrust setting on the Pegasus engines.
3: I have proven that the Harriers take on average around 1 minute too long to climb to altitude.
4: The Harriers thrust drops off by a good 50% at high speed so adding another 50% would legit just make it realistic.
So why does Gaijin have actual beef with the Harrier. This has gone on far too long for me to believe its ignorance or otherwise. This is purely them not wanting to buff it.
(If you look closely you can see max thrust rating wowwwwww)
Here is an installed thrust chart that maybe they can use unless they think they are correct over and above the actual people who made the planes.
I think I’m going to start working on a formal thread/bug report for it. Actually get some quantitve data and via someone like gunjob, get a more clear answer on how it all works from the Devs. Maybe even bully… I mean… Ask a CM if they could even do a dev-blog on how IR signatures work in game.
Then we’d have the foundation for enacting real change. I think at the moment, most people think we are just complaining for the sake of complaining without understanding what the actual issue is
1 Like