Haha, what?
You think a flareless harrier with some of the weakest and buggiest AAMs in game should be 10.7?
Do you know which harrier the Harrier GR1 is?
Dude, bugs don’t count… If for that Ariete has armour of 60 tons of air but they still put him at a high BR. But I could give you other examples of vehicles put at high BR with bugs.
Then why should the Harrier GR1 be a HIGHER BR than any of the other Harriers as it has no flares?
Putting at a higher BR than all-aspect slingers with no flares is kinda stupid.
Give me 1 reason why it should even be 9.7 and not 9.3. Let alone 10.7
10.7 is the same BR as the FRS1e with 2x 9L, 60 CMs, a radar with IFF and hopefully soon EEGS
At that BR he is extremely manoeuvrable his missiles work and he even carries 4 in combat when all the others carry 2.
Also at Italian Harrier and BR 13 avoid saying that Harrier GR.1 is the highest in BR because it is not.
As I said before skill problems.
Hu?
So AV-8A and AV-8S with 240 CMs and AV-8C and Harrier Gr3 with 60 CMs with identical FM and 2x Aim-9Gs is fine at 9.7 but the harrier Gr1 with no flares and 4x 800m AAMs needs to be 10.7 because it has 4 missiles instead of 2?
Heck, the GR1 doesnt even have an RWR and you want it a higher BR than the J35XS which is only at 10.3 because it has no RWR and that has CMs, 6x better AAMs and is supersonic
Might when the FM is actually fixed and is up to IRL performance, the other Harriers can go up. But with no flares, an uptier is a death sentence.
Spoken like a player who has never played any Harrier 1, especially the GR.1 that is objectively the worst of them all.
Let me guess, you’re just salty that a GR.1 Harrier ruined a dogfight in your Ariete or Sagittario with his actually terrible missiles?
1 Like