Unfinished prototype flew by the airforce for a official program.
The plane with functioning prototype is your best counterargument?
Im all for it, I wonder how deep will you dig your hole.
The AAS-72X was tested. Just not chosen. No different than your argument. As I said the airframe was ALREADY in service with the Army. The EADS North America team (Lockheed Martin , Eurocopter and American Eurocopter) fully tested the platform…It was fully tested. Read up on it. It wasn’t chosen. That doesn’t mean it never existed. We aren’t going to agree…so I’m done arguing with you. Do your own research. You are bringing the EXACT same argument. Period. Have a good day bro. Happy playing…
It should be easy for you to prove that then.
Assumed it was actually tested, you would be right. But you have yet to prove that.
UNARMED utility UH-72 was. Not AAX-72X.
Nothing like admiting defeat.
I will, and you know what? AAS-72X wont be added anytime soon.
It’s not admitting defeat, it’s not arguing with a rock. I could admit there’s no operational AAS-72X in the military. I can also admit there’s no operational Yak-141 that made it to active service. But there’s evidence of both aircraft being tested. The difference is the Uh-72 Lakota is an active airframe that was used to test the gunship version. The UH-72 Lakota is still active today. The Yak-141 air frame has NEVER been in active service yet it’s in the game. You are wanting me to prove that the gunship version existed, just like I want you to prove that a Yak-141 operational version existed in the military. You can’t. It’s not very hard to understand. I have nothing to prove. I could care less if it’s added. It was a question to the devs. Are you a Dev? No… Therefore, you can’t answer the question. This is like a dog chasing its tail…
If the AAS-72X never made it to even the state a prototype was even starting to be assembled, it fails even the lowest of requirements of Gaijins rules of what vehicles should or should not be added. To make a direct comparison of what you are asking, you are trying to make the same sort of argument people have made to add the Montana class battleships because they were ordered (but never even laid down or had any dedicated parts made) but were canceled before work even started, all because they share parts and equipment such as on the Iowa class, however what is required it to be eligible to add is if say a single 16 inch gun may have been made that wasn’t built with the intention of being on an Iowa or a spare barrel for an Iowa, but was one meant to go straight towards a Montana, however due to the fact nothing that was made for a Montana by the time of cancelation is the reason the Montana class isn’t eligible to be added in the current set rules by Gaijin. The reason the Yak-141 is allowed is because while it wasn’t armed it actually existed, they aren’t going to just add a vehicle which never made it to the prototype stage even if it’s a vehicle based off something that is real and in active service with even the country in question.