I don’t think its easy enough for BMPT+T80+2S38 spammers, they need their hands held more
4 Likes
Brilliant, of course; that’s exactly what I was thinking. Just don’t forget about the low tiers!
2 Likes
I was chilling in the LAV-AD today n just targeting 2S38’s, very therapeutic. The only real problem I’m having is the bmpt, which is why everyone’s spamming threads until it gets changed
2 Likes
Yes of course, let’s buff the already overpowered under BR’ed nation! seems like a fool proof plan.
4 Likes
Can’t forget to bring BT-7M to 1.3 and T-34(1942) to 3.7, and also bring the KV-1 L-11 to 3.0 since it’s a slower T-34(1940)! Lastly the T series should have more unbalanced buffs. After all Russia thunder must impress the mighty Russian way
1 Like
But you just have to aim for the weakspot \s
2 Likes
Imagine complaining about 2S38 in late 2025.
5 Likes
If i had a dollar for every cope thread about the USSR that has been posted on here, I’d be a millionare…
4 Likes
Not really cope when its true tho, am I right?
Yak 3P to 1.0 /J
No, you’re not right and I’m still a millionare…
I like to remind you:
Gaijin nerfed a lot of Nato equipment for balance reasons over the years.
Every Nato ATGM got nerfed to the ground or released in a unfinished or bugged state: Spike’s, Pars3, Tow’s, Hellfire, Brimstone, Mavericks. This is not Copium this is literal truth. I mean just take a look at the KH38MT and justify that missile to ANYTHING else in the game. You cant. That missile should not be in the game but it is. Yet somehow Nato cannot have any of that. Not even 2 Pylons of FnF Brimstones…
Spikes are only allowed to tickle Tanks (If they even track). Same for Pars3 and they also are still incredible inaccurate despite the fact that these missile are actually incredible accurate and deadly to any tank without a top attack APS. The LMUR is the best example. The Pars3 should have the same top attack mode like its proven in MBDA’s data sheet but to this day after 4 years it still does not have the top attack mode. The LMUR gets released and they add a special top attack mode thats unique to anything else in the game. What a load of s…
I wish they quit releasing new stuff for a year and finally fix all the stuff that shouldve been fixed 5 years ago… Some accepted bug reports are open for 3 years. Anyways I didnt plan on wasting my time writing another pointless complained about the game that wont change anything because we have to accept the bias and that’s it.
Edit: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1VWPOpYbQI This has not enough energy to kill a Tank in War Thunder btw.
Edit2: I got the LMUR number wrong no clue why I had 16 in mind doesnt change the fact that the missile is better than the Spike and Pars3 by far.
5 Likes
When it’s used in conjunction with a 6s reload T-80 and the BMPT spam, it absolutely is a problem. Imagine thinking the lineup it’s in isn’t problematic.
Wouldn’t even need a dollar. More like a dime
1 Like
This and the Spike and also MMP were specifically developed using gazillions of money to scratch the paint of 50+ year old tanks.
1 Like
Friend. There is cope, “Russian bias this, Russian bias that” and then there is the genuine cause and effect of Gaijin making changes to Russian vehicles and lineups (intro of BMPTs and buffing of Soviet autoloaders) that has had a measurable quantitative effect on match outcomes. I have had about a 98% loss rate against Soviet 10.3-11.3 since the update. I’m not even joking or exaggerating. The games I win are when there’s Soviets on my team. This is not normal, this is a the direct effect of changes implemented to the game, and it is breaking an entire BR bracket.
So dismiss it all you want, but this isn’t “hey the KV-1 is a bit too under BR’d” or “the T-34s have annoying volumetric models and black hole driver ports” or “oh this vehicles is over performing a little” this is absurd levels of game-breaking imbalance brought on by poor decision making by the people calling shots.
2 Likes
Just because a vehicle is in a certain lineup, doesn’t mean it is oppressive.
1 Like
Good then that the Mi28 indeed carries 8 LMURS and not 16.
You don’t even know what you are crying about, you just cry for the sake of it.
4 Likes
Sorry your correct. I can’t remember why I had 16 in mind. I haven’t played ground in a while. I was pretty sure it was able to carry 16 when I saw the videos about it but nvm. Yet the argument still stands. That missile works 10x better than any Nato FnF missile in the game.
Hard to believe when it comes from a guy not even knowing the basics of vehicles he’s talking about.
1 Like