How much you want to bet this thread gets to 1000
1 Like
Was talking about mcplopish.
But maybe your his alt account.
IS-7 8.3 -----> 8.7 or Obj 279 9.0 ----- 8.7 those tanks should be close at br. IS7 has better armor and mobility and 279 is stab, slightly better pen but less armored and slower.
Steam roll other nations?
That’s irony
3.0 / 3.7 is very good for the USA
4.7 / 5.7 has very potent vehicles
7.0 is commonly top, the USA has extremely potent 7.0s and 6.7s
I have a couple buddies who are USA mains who agree the 7.0 lineup is super busted. That’s why if we aren’t getting good games, that’s the go to have fun.
The other excellent br bracket is the 9.0 / 8.7 lineup.
The m1128 line up is also excellent, with one of the best 10.0 spaa in the game.
I think they’re both at appropriate brs, perhaps the IS-7 could be 8.3 due to the advent of HEAT-FS being everywhere
I mean 279 is fighting HEAT + APFSDS which is kinda worst. Why IS-7 should stay OP and 279 just good that’s unfair. 0.3 GAP dif should be better knowing the stats of IS-7 being way too good.
The armor on the Obj.279 is better, and has a full stabilizer. Thus there’s a br difference.
IS-7 has no stabilizer, and doesn’t have the same armor
So that is Your argumentation? Nothing else?
2 Likes
No 279 has worse armor I can tell you ok thats it has a stab thats why it should be 0.3 below it but not 0.7. Obj 279 can be killed by a Guepard from the front “Driver hatch zone”. And stats say it all. IS-7 need to go up. Seeing mid players doing amazing games in is just crazy (talking abt a winner of the 12 IS7 drop). But I see why you say this… But yeah, IS7 gun is not that hard to aim when you move and the fact you have better armor and mobility makes it being 8.7.
I’ve already posed my argument at the very beginning
If you having nothin constructive to say, don’t say anything at all
It’s not busted but it’s is one of Americas best lineups.
Please elaborate
You have the M46 which is pretty much an American Leopard 1 but a whole BR lower, the T29 which is a very good heavy tank, the T92 which is a super ratty light tank with HEATFS, and all the strong 6.7 tanks that you can bring if you want such as the Jumbo Pershing.
Plus good CAS as always with America
3 Likes
Idk, I get pretty close to a nuke in any match I play the T29 or get a nuke
Don’t forget the m551 76
Please don’t compare 90mm gun to 105mm gun. Not to mention totally better mobility when it comes to Leo1.
90mm HEATFS is known for little post-pen damage.
7.0 which has a lot of vehicles that can pen it without much of an issue.
That are known for little post pen damage.
T26E5 with short 90mm gun, sure.
With little over 2 K/D that doesn’t sound real.
1 Like
The Leopard 1 is faster and the HEATFS has better damage, but it’s also an entire BR higher, has worse armor, and lacks APHE.
The M46 might have a slower top speed but it accelerates very well.
So? The gun is really good, you have a good reverse gear and good turret armor. All heavy tanks around 7.0-7.7 suffer in that regard because of APDS/HEAT.
It’s still very fast, very small, and has a fast reload.
And the M56 and M50
I also didn’t mention the T95 or the M551 (76)
P.S. I’m not saying these vehicles should go up but I do believe they are very good.
2 Likes
Armor on Leo is really bouncy, so I wouldn’t say it is bad. Not to mention that Leo is not made for taking shots.
M46 is not mobile overall.
All of that can be said about other heavies.
Like most of light tanks at that or lower B.R.?
Both are very situational, not good in most cases.
Don’t make me laugh about T95
After I learned how to play it effectively, and wasn’t a noob, my kd in it skyrocketed.
It’s also a 2.34 ;)
It is still nothing special and doesn’t back up what You are saying really.
1 Like