The Centurion was sent out to germany for field trials before V-J day I believe so it’s also a ww2 vehicle by technicality.
1 Like
kv-1s have volumetric privilege on par with a panther or maus
like sure dude that DEFINITELY wouldn’t have caved your mantlet and fucked your breech up at practically point blank
This is called the hazing mentality lol they are “oh I was treated terribly when I was in your shoes, so now it is my right to make it your duty to be treated terribly too”. Hate the so called managers very much especially in corporate world, they often scare that someone can do their job without having to suffer the way they did in the past lol
2 Likes
They would be fighting same br tanks though.
So are us mains for me, I don’t see your point.
First, this is off topic. Second they could’ve beaten USSR or at least got to the oil fields if USSR didn’t have us support, which would’ve helped them greatly.
I mean, those 18 aircraft that can carry some A2G are practically CAP, like I said previously. Those that get CCRP are somewhat in a better position but arguably are CAP too. The true CAS aircraft at those BRs don’t struggle too much against the typical radar SPAA, like the SK60B, Thai Albatross, etc.
Still much better than the crappier FM of the SAAB-105G that doesn’t get any flares, only gets access to only one gun pod (if you want to maximize for bombs), and 2x Aim-9Bs (instead of 2x Aim-9Gs). Resulting in the SAAB-105G carrying 3x 1000lb bombs, 2x Aim-9Bs, and a gun pod.
They should be at least a 0.7 BR difference, which is what they are at the moment.
I think the Harriers at 9.3 seem reasonable to me.
Sure, but the only way they seem to be able to kill you in that instance are through unfair means.
You’d need to test that with me because I don’t think that’s the case in front-aspect.
I mean, I think that’s fair. In all honesty, I think they should’ve just kept the ARB BRs in GRB but tweak around the SPAA and CAS BRs. I have no idea why they thought, for the longest time might I add, that, for example, the J-7E should be moved down to 10.3 in GRB where the MiG-21SMT / MF exists, practically invalidating their position as being competent CAP at that BR. Now it’s happening again at 8.7 - 10.0 where vehicles like the J-7D / MiG-21SMT / MiG-21MF / NF-5A / Chinese F-5A have decent CAS ordnance for 9.7 and yet are vastly superior CAP options at the same time than some CAP 0.3 BRs lower / at the same BR.
I don’t understand why the Chinese F-5A is 0.3 BRs higher than the FJ-4B VMF-232, which only gets one less bullpup but, in return, gets a much better FM, afterburner, access to two good missiles (Aim-9Js equivalents), and access to a bunch of flares.
someone please explain to me why the actual fuck the chieftains 3 and 5 are 8.7
They’re the same BR as a T-62 quit complaining about them.
M60s etc.
Although imo the T-62 is one of the worst 8.7s purely because it’s reload is kinda long.
They’re outright worse than the Olifant Mk 1 and they’re slow enough that you’re going to get got by some rat vehicle that has no business being on your side of the map before you can even get to the battle and they aren’t even good at sniping without the rangefinder unlock, which is a tier 3 unlock for some godforsaken reason. Also they have HESH as their secondary round so :)
Also it’s not remotely fair to put these fucking things in 9.7 games when the armor isn’t even good for 7.7 games.
Yeah dude the tank that’s outright worse in practically every way than things before it deserves to be a higher BR because it’s a contemporary to the T-62. What’s next? Sightlines from cover into spawn are good map design? The T58 is appropriately BR’d and not overpowered? God you people.
I never want to hear such nonsense again. I WAS THE ONE WHO WARNED EVERYONE THIS THING WAS GOING TO BREAK THE GAME.
9.0 is still obscenely too low. 2.5 second reload and a round that kills you instantly by hitting the fucking tracks is stupid. It should quite frankly be deleted from the game and be unable to be put into lineups but since gaijin is never going to make the actually correct decision we can at least put it to 9.7
There was an opportunity to nerf the T58 reload to 4 seconds, but it’s sadly not substantiated enough. Hopefully more can be found to narrow down with certainty what the reload speed is suppose to be.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/VPrXlWqkvWpI
In the mean time, they could probably nerf the replenishment speed. That’s a soft stat that has enough wiggle room for fiddling with, and most of the T58’s ammo is not very accessible to the crew.
1 Like
Yeah the T58 has been such a cash cow that they’re not nerfing it again.
Last I checked since it went from 8.3 → 8.7 it went from being the 4th best vehicle down to the 9th pretty much over night.
Edit:
Apparently now it’s in 27th place.
So it’s never gonna get nerfed again.
Simple, just move the olifant to 8.7. It’s already an outlier at 8.3.
1 Like
today we nerf britain again because?
And why should British vehicles be an exception when it comes to balance changes moving up their vehicles?
4 Likes
Because they don’t suffer like their player base says.
If you want to play a actual nation that suffers go play Italy
Italy has its good / OP vehicles too tbf
Iike? 2a7HU and Turan are the only ones that come to to mind.
And the P40
1 Like