Ho-Ri fomo. I think including low tier japanese tanks in any stats is putting a possible outlier in your dataset until september.
Opinion invalidated.
me when the stat website has the stats for every vehicle in the game
Global stats are a terrible argument for vehicle balancing. Global stats are why the EBR (1951) is at 5.3
I wasn’t sure why you were doing SL a game tbh.
But soon I’ll play the m4a1 once more as well as the KV-85 and see if I do just as well. I should, given a few of you are saying they’re better.
I mean, wouldn’t it have been the worst regardless of whether or not the Tiger 2 P went down to 6.3 or not?
Also, it’s more like the Tiger II P should have never went back down to 6.3 rather than the T-34-100 necessarily having to be moved down.
Also, I’d honestly take the T-34-100 over the IS-2s and T-44-122 in most occasions to be honest with you.
Well, 11.5s is certainly not great, but it’s definitely better than the IS-2’s 20.8s reload, T34’s 14.9s reload, and many of the 5.7 - 6.3 SPH reloads, and it at least penetrates and one-shots most things (because of its 100g of TNT).
After they added solid-shot to a lot of APHE rounds after detonating, the engine strat against APHE doesn’t work nearly as well as it used to, but it’s still viable if you angle well:
It’s as good as (if not better than) most mediums at this BR.
T25 has better top speed and reverse speed but way worse acceleration to due its abysmal transmission and HP/Ton:
It means that it may only reach ~40km/h if it’s lucky.
Spoiler
M4/T26 (another 6.0/6.3 medium) has even worse mobility across the whole board:
Spoiler
All the 6.0 Panthers have similar mobility, where they have worse top speed than the T-34-100, usable reverse speed, and worse acceleration:
Spoiler
The Centurion Mk.1 has a much worse top speed, worse acceleration, but much more usable reverse speed:
Spoiler
Finally, there’s the Charioteer Mk VII, with much better acceleration and top speed, but much worse reverse speed (Though at least it gets good neutral steering):
Spoiler
As for the other 6.0 - 6.3 mediums, the T20’s and T-34-85 (STP)'s mobility are overall better:
Spoiler
Spoiler
The T-44-122 and T-44 (FM) also have overall better acceleration:
Spoiler
As well as the ST-A1 and ST-A2, both sharing overall better mobility over the T-34-100, with slightly worse top speed but much better reverse speed and slightly better acceleration:
Spoiler
So its mobility is better than every heavy, a good number of TDs (especially if we’re excluding SPHs), and half of the medium tanks at the 6.0 - 6.3 range.
It’s definitely not great, but it’s definitely not unusable, nor the worst amongst its class.
It’s heavier by 1 tonne.
They still have very similar acceleration, which is great unless you’re calling the T-34-85’s acceleration bad.
Yes, this is one of the drawbacks of the T-34-100. It makes it so that it’s less survivable against shots through the turret than the T-34-85. Though a clean shot through the T-34-85’s turret can often kill all of its tightly-packed crew too, or detonate its turret bustle ammo (which always exists unless you’re out of ammo).
Not really hard to be worse than all its [medium tank] counterparts when the only medium tank counterparts are some of the most META in the entire game (I’m talking specifically about the T20 and T-34-85 (STP)).
Not really. Again, I’d rather take the M4A1 (76) and KV-85 over the VK.3002 on most maps.
It’s good at 5.0. I’m not saying it should go down to 4.7. I’m also not saying it should go up to 5.3.
1 Like