Ground Vehicles **PROPOSED** RB battle rating changes

Sorry I have money?

And lol I bought the T58, because I warned it was going to be OP as hell but not a lot of people wanted to listen to that.

Somua is a very good tank, but I wouldn’t quite call it OP.

  1. The lower plate shot doesn’t work 75% of the time.

  2. List all the 6.7 tanks that can frontally kill a Maus.

Me too!! But i spend it in important things and i also save some money, u never know if something can happen to u and in those moments is where u need that money that u spent in a virtual tank. Btw, your money, your decission, i dont have any problem with that pal!!

So u bought it because u knew it was going to be op, u called me abussive for buying and use a tech tree tank when i was at 6.7 with the US

Good at his br, can do good at an uptier, but OP at a low tier because it is a jumbo amx50 at the same br. Oh talking about that, we have amx50 and somua sm wich is a jumbo version of it, then, using your logic we should make it 8.0 no?

It does work 100% of the times, lfp shot is always a one shot, the thing is that u just gotta shoot to the left or the right side, never the center because it will ricochet, if u want, i can show u even more weakpoints now, and if u let me use the Tiger II i can multiply the weakspot even more!! Think about all u saw was with the 75mm of the panther, but some of those weakpoints can be used to destroy the pershing even using a panzer IV f2

For sure!! I hope this helps u ;)
EEUU:
-T26E5: using apcr
-T34: using the normal apcbc
-T26E1: using apcr
-M56: using heat-fs or the apcr
-M50: using his heat-fs
-M26: using apcr
-M26E1: using apcr

Germany:
-Lekpz m41: using the apds or the heat fs
-Tiger II H/P: using the apcr, even the apcbc can if u make a good shot
-Ferdinand/Elephant: the same as tiger II’s
-Jadgtiger: using the apcbc

USSR:
-T44: cant pen his front, just using a small weakpoint that ill show u at the end
-There are no more 6.7 tanks for russia, but the ones at 6.3 with the 100mm gun can pen it without issues

Uk:
-Tortoise: apcbc
-Ratel 90: heat fs

Japan:
-Type 60 C: heat fs
-Type 60 atm: atgm
-Type 61: heat fs
-STA3: heat fs

China:
-Type 62: Heat fs

Italy:
M26: apcr
Aubl: heat fs
FIAT: heat fs
Palmaria: HE overpressure

France:
M26: apcr
AuF1: HE overpressure
(Ill count the old amx m4 when it was 6.7+ amx13)
Amx m4: apcbc
Amx13: use apcbc and shoot directly to the 75mm gun

Sweeden:
-Pbv 501: Heat fs
-Bkian: HE overpressure spam

Israel:
-Zachlam Tager: atgm

Fun facts:
-Maus can be killed even for some 5.0 tanks
-If your gun is up to 75mm u can always shoot behind of the maus with HE and it somehow overpressure
-U can pen the maus even with some 75mm guns on the front just shooting directly to the 75mm gun

And those are all the 6.7 tanks, hope u enjoyed!!

Edit:
Just in cause u doubt it, watch this.

Ammo boom with the apcbc of the amx13

Aaaand


Boom using 85mm HE, 700g of explosive btw

Just in the case that u dont believe the trickshot with 75mm guns work in real games, let me show u

The random attempt at an insult is peak. But sure let’s go with your idealism.

Secondly, the 100mm Russian guns you speak of struggle with BR412D, only 1 in 9 rounds pierced.

Lastly, a bug, we are counting bugs now? Then all USA vehicles should be nerfed due to a .50 cal bug years ago

Yes this requires a smaller cannon, but good luck trying to replicate that lol

U are that child that think i tried to insult u? Im giving u advice boy. Dont spend your money on games or atleast if u do, i would recommend u buy actual games, think about every premium u buy is an AAA game. Just think about that!!

Maybe u should learn to aim, i just proved u how every 6.7 can pen the maus, so what about that now?

Not a bug, the explossive enters from the slits that the maus has behind. U were always able to do this.

I just showed u how i did it? Lol, that clips is from me, i have more if u want pal!!
Atleast u dont say “t26e5 is a 7.0” anymore, u are just defending yourself right now because u lost every argument lmao.
Have a nice day dude.

I can see why they wanted to move the T26E5 to 7.0.

I’ve now played 7 matches with it, 44 kills to 4 deaths, 100% winrate, 6.5 kills average per spawn.

This thing is pretty busted at 6.7.

2 Likes

So, using the protection analysis for E-100 (same turret) shows the 51P from AMX-13 can’t pen the turret armor at 100m. The analysis also shows 75mm gun beig destroyed, but no crew members.

In that example, what are you hitting? Putting a shot right down the middle of the 128mm barrel?
I suppose if the enemy angles barrel or turret somewhat that shot will not work?

U gotta make a good shot, that requires good aim. It is hard,but not impossible. I do that a lot of times when i dont have enough pen, even got called hacker when i killed people like that with a 75mm xD

Tbh that just mean u got good matchs where no one knew where to hit u, i already showed an entire list of all weakspots of the t26e5 wich are a ton compared to the Tiger II weakspots. If u make a skilled player with a Tiger II fight against a skilled player in a t26e5 it is almost for sure that the one with the tiger II will win.
Btw, talking about op things, rn almost everytime im getting a downtier to 5.7 in the Tiger II P is almost a sure nuke,tbh only vehicle that struggles to kill the Tiger II P is the 75mm jumbo, but for some reason all the other players just dont aim in time to the turret or directly shoots at the chassis wich is kinda funny. Ill tell u what i personally would have done.
-US T34 (6.7>7.0) this one is a competent actual 7.0 tank
-Germany Tiger II P (6.7=6.7) it did good at his br if u knew how to use the Tiger II family tbh, idk why people still rush like if they were braindead when Tiger II’s are for snipe and move carefully into the battlefield
-Tiger II H “just maybe” (6.7>7.0) and u would wonder why. Let me tell u really fast, really goof sniper,the best armour at 6.7, without any doubt the best heavy of 6.7 that does have bad overall stats because of that people that goes into the battle thinking “im on a king tiger im invencible”, i know that Tiger II 105 is already at 7.0, but hey, m26e1 is better than m26 and they are at the same BR so i dont see the problem. Only weakness of the Tiger II would be the overall mobility but as i said,it is an armoured sniper so its not that needed, i sometimes use the Tiger II at 7.7 with the maus and it does really good.

Not really.

T34 isn’t as good as a T26E5 because it’s got no APHE and that crap reload.

Nope.

Atrocious mobility, sluggish gun handling, permanent ammo rack in the turret, garbage turret armour.
It should never be the same BR as a T26E5.

T26E5 has better armour.
A flat 185mm turret face means almost everything can just lolpen you frontally.

Sniping is also completely non-meta, sitting back and sniping doesn’t contribute to the outcome of the game, unless you actually play from powerpositions that dominate large sections of the map, but Tiger II’s have such terrible mobility that you’ll never get there before your opponents do.

2 Likes

Btw, this is what jumbo has to deal with rn a lot of times


Not even with a frontal direct apcr shot to turret nor a side shot to the turret with apcbc the jumbo were able to pen the tiger II P xD

1 Like

It has an amazing cannon with a short reload, and is very stable on the move (heck, it’s practically stabilized with CC1).

The turret armor is trolly, especially when angled.

As i aleays say, Tiger II is the best heavy tanks. But US does have the best lineup of 6.7 so yeh, Tiger II would kill t26e5 much before it could even get close to the Tiger II

T34 is actually really goof, the reload isnt that bad and the apcbc is that big that doesnt need explossive. Btw, t26e5 doesnt have an aphe, it does have apcbc with explossive filler just like german tanks.

I think u have a bug trauma with the t26e5

Check my latest post, i did a list of all one shots u can make to the t26e5 just using a panther or even a tiger H1, i would have showed more but i would need the tiger II for that. Meanwhile, the only weakspots of the Tiger II are the mg port wich is smaller than the US one,the cuppola and the turret obviously.

Trust me, u can do it

Your guys’ comments made me play the T26E5 again:

image

Stomping a bunch of Tiger II’s that can’t do anything to me and racking up 12 kills.

No different from what a Panther has to deal with when facing a T26E5.

image

The gun is the only great thing about it.

Of course it is when it barely goes above 20 km/h.
If you’re barely moving you’re naturally going to be stable.

16 seconds without explosive filler ain’t bad???

I see that’s working out great for them:

And the cupola, and simply overmatching the turret sides (which are garbage due to only being 80mm and sloping inwards).

You’re on a 51% winrate in the Tiger II Early and a 47% in the Tiger II, not exactly encouraging when it comes to that playstyle being able to carry matches.

2 Likes

Congrats for the good match and the nuke!!

U see all those weakspots? All of them are a one shot, and think about this is a 6.0 against it, now look at what a Tiger II can do to him

Dont forget about the armour

Not that bad, btw, if u want a better experience,u can play t26e1

90% of those tiger II were Tiger II P btw, i just see a lot of german mains with tunnel vision tbh, if atleast one of the Tiger II H’s would have fight back without giving u his side what would u have done? Since as i see u dont carry any apcr round, btw, i gotta say that first shot to the mg port was nice, but what was that tiger II doing? As i said, problem is german mains, not the t26e5 itself

Yeh, as i said, used to be one of those german mains lol, then started playing the US, needed to do some research of weakpoints, now that i know the weakpoints of all the tanks i can play without any problem on the Tiger II’s but yeh, u are right my stats are a lil bit destroyed by those times. Btw,im making them better month, it is kinda to change bad stats from 2 years so wish me luck mate!!

1 Like

Unfortunately nowhere near enough time to drop it.

Those are pixel weakspots and some of them (mantlet) don’t result in any meaningful damage, even for the long 88 which just has it’s damage eaten by the breech.

The same can’t be said for a 90mm penning the turret front of a Tiger II Early however, those are usually one-shot-kills.

That’s like saying: ‘‘See all those weakspots? All of them are a one shot, and think about this is a 7.7 T-54 against it!’’

image

Good luck with that in an actual match though.

I don’t mention the armour because the armour is terrible on the Early version.

They just get deleted with ease, and let’s be honest here, this 90mm doesn’t even have the best pen at 6.7 either.

Same thing as the very first Tiger II H in the compilation.

MG port, barrel or cupola, you’ve got decent options.

Besides, 80% of the time you’re not fighting them perfectly head-on, or you can simply wait for them to expose a weak side.

Yeah, my point is also that the Tiger II Early going down to 6.3 is justified, it simply shouldn’t be the same BR as a T26E5.

Also don’t forget that the Tiger II’s have absolutely awful, and I do mean truly horrendous mobility.
They used to be semi-alright with the 700 hp engines, but now that they’re 600 hp they’ve gotten 30-40% worse.

The T26E5 is certainly no speed demon, but when even a sluggish T26E5 is massively more mobile than you, you know you’re in trouble:
image

2 Likes

Yeh, know how that feels, got my second nuke only using SPAA but this time at 12.0, i couldnt launch the nuke in time because my team lost the game, kinda sad tbh

Ill be honest with u, u are not a pro, but u are a real good player tbh, i would consider myself right now just as good, good thing is that i know every weakpoint.


These are your stats, ill give u the stats of every player u killed in that video in a later post bro.

But hey, lets be fair, we cant compare a modern tank against a post WWII era tank, but we can compare a WWII against a WWII. Lets be fair.

I didnt have any trouble since players at low tier for some reason aim at the chassis 90% of the times, and the players in jumbo struggle to pen the turret even using apcr that is kinda sad

Not bad,but against an experienced player it wouldnt be that easy

Tbh, this argument that u say is fair. The problem is that most 6.3 players panic when they see a Tiger II and they dont know what to do, making them fail their shots, the moment u find a mid experienced player he will just shoot at your turret, we know that, but think about what it feels to be a level 25 and see a tiger II in a sherman, u are horrified!!

So it was a barrel shot?

When you say a “lot of times”… these enemies are not moving their turrets?
(easier to do of course on casemates)

1 Like