I would argue there is a need. I’d consider Rank I to be extremely unbalanced, but no one talks about it since you aren’t forced to spend too much time there. Considering this is meant to be the first exposure new players get, I see a major need to address this issue instead of just leaving it be.
If you honestly feel that the BT series’s placement fine as is, than there’s really nothing more I can say. You’re entitled to your own opinion, and we’ll just have to agree to disagree.
I’d say vehicles like M8 LAC and Stuart are some of the bigger offenders. Yes the BT’s are fast with decent guns but the stuarts are similar with better armor and stabilizers.
M8 LAC has a very high mounted 50 which can pen most vehicles from behind a hill lol. I’d say 1.7 for both the 1.0 Stuart and the M8 LAC
It’s not quite so simple for the Stuarts. There’s several different parameters that are ahistorical and could be nerfed. With those changes applied, the M2A4 could be 1.3.
I’d personally go as far as to say they are imo they best vehicle from ,1.x-2.x seriously they are just solid all-rounders
Regardless asking for gaijin to change something seems far fetched they only like doing that to nations they don’t like.
Seriously though Mig-29 would be far better if they lost the R27ER for the R73 (just using them as an example given people have asked for this forever)
Yes. Which isn’t a bad idea. You adjust it, if the stats drop and become more balanced good. If not, then move it.
Here I disagree.
I think it is good to look at the whole of the picture.
I have issues with all KV tanks they’re a bitch to pen, you’re the one who doesn’t know how to read. Obviously I’m making fun of you for buying the tigers if you didn’t spend money on the KV-220.
The KV tanks aren’t all that hard to kill. What are you using against them?
Skill issue.
Explains a lot
Oh the irony:
You know that You can earn GJN by just playing the game?
Edit: what was wrong with it?
I think point 2 is a questionable metric as of present given the state of the matchmaker and how often you’re getting full uptiers (like all the time).
If you ever catch me saying I’m good at this game you can use that against me, but I’ve never said that. And so what, my arcade mode stats have the Centurion 1 as my most played tank. What’s your point?
Just because You have an issue fighting KV tanks it doesn’t mean that KV tanks are that good.
We are in RB section of the forum and what I have posted is RB stats.
To be fair they are by far the most annoying tanks to pen and easily kill in the 4.X area unless you are playing a German tank or a TD. However, I wouldn’t call any undertiered now that the Kv-1E/B are both rightfully 4.3.
Idk. M4A2 with addon tracks all over is 4.0 and even more annoying than the Kv-1E
Shermans are enough to deal with them eaisly.
Everything is easy to deal with in a Sherman, it’s just that the KV-1s are the most annoying.
You have to aim while being stabilized, I would call it inconvenience rather than annoyance
what??? tiger 2 105 put in 7.3 and t54 same 7.3 br man u smoking? u are somehow russian main? or other t54 with heatfs in 7.7 to fight tiger 2 sems fair and balanced… why no put bmpt or t90m in 6.7 in this mode?
I don’t disagree with you, but I just tend to give the most precedence to point 1 and 2. There’s some circumstances where vehicles are just not very intuitive, but can be very strong situationally, which is where player skill becomes a important factor to consider. But more often than not, I find it to be unreliable.
Avg Stats are influenced by many factors beyond what a vehicle can actually do (ie: popularity, ease of obtaining, nation, line-up potential). This is why a lot of copy+paste or very similar vehicles having very different player stats, which is proof of the flaws of relying on that metric. That’s how we ended up with the M48A2 C at a lower BR than the M48A1 for some time.
