Did you also win the lotto?
Sadly not, would have much more time for WT :(
probably also some nice marketplace vehicles
1 Like
moving the T-34-85 STP to 6.0
4 Likes
T-34-85 STP is definitely an improvement over the T-34-85, but the addition of the stabilizer, two smoke barrels, and a side-grade APHE doesn’t seem to warrant a 0.7 BR difference.
2 Likes
Make the listing, and I will add it.
1 Like
Like what? I would never pay for an IS-7
Where
Like some BP vwhickes or event vehicles I missed. Mostly french ones. Maybe a pak puma, fun vehicles mostly
Here. Just copy the format from the original post
The Tigris can’t pen the tiger 2H frontally except very few places it doesn’t have the APCR or smoke grenades so I say it’s very fair to place at 5.7 same for the heavy tank No6 the heavy tank no6 also has the mine dischargers that make angling harder
Ok
T-34-85 STP 6.3 > 6.0 (As mentioned, having a stabiliser, smokebarrels and a side grade APHE isn’t worth a 0.7 BR increase over the other T-34-85s)
1 Like
All Vehicles I don’t play should go up in BR, those I play down in the BR. That’s basically this thread.
1 Like
Both of those are Tiger E’s. The Tigris even has add on track armor making it’s front more resistant.
You are basically arguing the arguably best Tiger E platform, the Tigris due to the added front armor making angling more effectively should be the same BR as the Tiger H1.
I bought the IS-7 for around 120 GJN back when the event was going on. About 80 Gaijin from selling event components and 40 GJN out of my own pockets.
In hindsight it was a stonks decision.
1 Like
Take the track armor away then it has no right facing the tiger 2H which should be 7.0 but that’ll never happen
2 Likes
It’s literally a Tiger E. Are you saying the other Tiger E’s should all go to 5’7? If so. Then should the Tiger H1 go to 5’3 since it’s worse than the Tiger E?
Also, you can absolutely kill a Tiger 2 with it. Both the Pzgr and Pzgr 39 just straight up punch through the turret cheeks. In an IS-2 it’s a coin toss because it’s funny volumetric hell. T26E5 is pretty much two small spots on the turret ring and the machine gun port.
You can’t expect even a single person to have a perfectly neutral stance on a tank. They either like it or dislike it.
That’s precisely my point. Everyone has implicit biases which will affect their opinions on just about every vehicle in the game.
For my sake, I generally can’t stand slow tanks, and especially higher tiered ones. Accordingly, I don’t really like Centurions and M60s, generally. I’ll play them when they’re an important part of a lineup, but I don’t like them, and will generally prefer other options. They just don’t fit well into my aggressive, flank focused playstyle.
At the same time, I can acknowledge that, despite my personal dislike of them, they’re solid tanks. They work, and they don’t need to be adjusted (mostly).