Ground Vehicles **PROPOSED** RB battle rating changes

KDR is mostly influenced by player but what B.R. vehicle faces is not.

Last time I checked, KW-220 have better stats on thunderskill than T58.

Of course there is, gaijin always looks how on average vehicle works, not how good players do in it. I would love if they changed they way of thinking but here we are.

5.7 and 6.0 time.

Recently when It comes to russia, I played mostly stabilized T-34-85 using the same ammo that KW-220 uses.

Because of how on average people play with it

I feel in some way me playing Obj.248 was responsible for its B.R. Change

1 Like

That’s why I don’t take statshark seriously :)

1 Like

I understand but sadly gaijin only cares about average player

My stats in T18E2 are perfect example of it

yea thats when nobody (with normal sleeping times) is awake. its free stomping as its mostly americans that got lost or chinese players outside of sweat hours.

mid day when europe is awake is steady but simple but the evenings toughen up a bit.

comparable times of day on NA from my own experiences are easier, even with going from less than 30ms ping at the worst to between 85-120ms ping.

1 Like

Typically during normal sleeping times the sweats are on lol

I finally just got the first 6.3 game ever in the Kv-220

not from my own experience. sweat times on EU are when the most chinese players arrive to be problematic. which is late evening in the BRs i tend to stick to at least

You mean cheat players? Lol 90% of them do

players of questionable legitimacy increase difficulty too. so i am including them.

which is usually around 8pm HKST as thats when most people have gotten home from work or school in mainland china, and is the evening in Hong Kong, Macau and south asia as a whole.

However must say when ive played on SA servers (i cant select them so only do when an aussie is squad leader) despite horrific packet loss and ping, its the easiest server in the game.

We have plenty of them on the NA server 24/7

I do think thats largely which players decide to go where. Its no different to when i go to NA to sealclub, because thats exactly what they are doing too. the ones that decide to do it have other common traits

I don’t think one server is inherently going to be easier than another.

It’s all who you match up against.

What would solve most issues would be to make it so you can’t see a full 1.0 uptier.

I’d rather wait 10 more secs and have a fun good game, rather than a game where my gun is useless.

In the case of the T18 that’s an odd tank

Edit: again, though if not moved to 5.7, the Kv-220 should get a reload buff. @ULQ_LOVER
Because against Tiger IIs and the like, ferdinans, jag’s patchers etc it really cannot compete

1 Like

To be honest, it should be 5.7

1 Like

what about the regular centauro at 9.3? i think it could get DM33 to balance it out with the other ones

also pretty sure the VRCC has better thermals than the other two

i have no idea how this one slipped past all the br changes… literally every time i see people suggesting this exact change but nothing happens in the end

1 Like

Better thermals doesn’t really justify an br increase. If it had like m900 sure, different br.

DM33 isn’t bad my any metric the gun and mobility are what make those tanks decent, but the other factors make them meh.

I just know the VRCC and the Centaurus are in a bad place.

And there is no easy solution to fixing them

Added:

RUSSIA:

BMPT/ BMPT-72 10.3 → 11.0 GRB/GSB

This vehicle is too good for 10.3, and likely too good for 10.7 making it 11.0 will give the T-90A a backup vehicle to use, and have a balanced br for the vehicle. It’s very lethal which makes it great, but like other T-72s the BMPTs can be lower plated with ease.

7 Likes

ISRAEL:

Magach 6M - no BR change, give it M413 (DM33 equivalent)

give it M413 to bring it in line with other 9.0 pattons, since it is currently completely outclassed by its BR contemporaries

Spoiler

as it currently stands, this is the worst 9.0 patton

compared to the american TTS it has:
-much worse turret armor (since this magach has the m60 turret)
-worse ERA (260 CE compared to 400 CE)
-MUCH worse dart, the m111 is a dm23 equivalent, while others have dm33 or m774
-worse optics, 7.2-8x zoom compared to 3-12x

all in all there is isn’t much point in playing this one, its just completely outclassed in so many ways
giving it m413 would atleast close the gap with the chinese/thai TTS

3 Likes

I said the same thing a while ago; based on dates and the FCS, both the Shot Kal Dalet and the Magach 6M should carry the M413.

1 Like

Could you re format it a bit to match plz and thank you