Here. Just copy the format from the original post
The Tigris can’t pen the tiger 2H frontally except very few places it doesn’t have the APCR or smoke grenades so I say it’s very fair to place at 5.7 same for the heavy tank No6 the heavy tank no6 also has the mine dischargers that make angling harder
Ok
T-34-85 STP 6.3 > 6.0 (As mentioned, having a stabiliser, smokebarrels and a side grade APHE isn’t worth a 0.7 BR increase over the other T-34-85s)
1 Like
All Vehicles I don’t play should go up in BR, those I play down in the BR. That’s basically this thread.
1 Like
Both of those are Tiger E’s. The Tigris even has add on track armor making it’s front more resistant.
You are basically arguing the arguably best Tiger E platform, the Tigris due to the added front armor making angling more effectively should be the same BR as the Tiger H1.
I bought the IS-7 for around 120 GJN back when the event was going on. About 80 Gaijin from selling event components and 40 GJN out of my own pockets.
In hindsight it was a stonks decision.
1 Like
Take the track armor away then it has no right facing the tiger 2H which should be 7.0 but that’ll never happen
2 Likes
It’s literally a Tiger E. Are you saying the other Tiger E’s should all go to 5’7? If so. Then should the Tiger H1 go to 5’3 since it’s worse than the Tiger E?
Also, you can absolutely kill a Tiger 2 with it. Both the Pzgr and Pzgr 39 just straight up punch through the turret cheeks. In an IS-2 it’s a coin toss because it’s funny volumetric hell. T26E5 is pretty much two small spots on the turret ring and the machine gun port.
You can’t expect even a single person to have a perfectly neutral stance on a tank. They either like it or dislike it.
That’s precisely my point. Everyone has implicit biases which will affect their opinions on just about every vehicle in the game.
For my sake, I generally can’t stand slow tanks, and especially higher tiered ones. Accordingly, I don’t really like Centurions and M60s, generally. I’ll play them when they’re an important part of a lineup, but I don’t like them, and will generally prefer other options. They just don’t fit well into my aggressive, flank focused playstyle.
At the same time, I can acknowledge that, despite my personal dislike of them, they’re solid tanks. They work, and they don’t need to be adjusted (mostly).
2S25M 10.0 to 10.3 (so it can now fit the Soviet 10.3 lineup, in my case it is the BMP-2M, the T-72B (10.0 material), the T-72B (1989), the 2S25M and the OSA-AKM)
You can take it to 10.3 without it’s BR changing.
5 Likes
That is true
Added:
T-34-85 STP 6.3 → 6.0
(As mentioned, having a stabiliser, smokebarrels and a side grade APHE isn’t worth a 0.7 BR increase over the other T-34-85s)
3 Likes
Dont get me wrong it struggles but no. Hell no. Its a matter of tiger 2s and the other 6.7 heavies being too low
T-34-85 should be 6.0 already, those things are OP as hell (YES I PLAY THEM) and hmmer tigers like its nothing.
A low speed stabiliser makes brawling even easier
30mm more pen and still enough TNT to one shot every time (or turret wipe from cupola snipes 100% of the time) is an upgrade. if you think its a sidegrade its a skill issue
3 Likes
i change my mind to 8.0 Br Reason This:
front hull armor will get changed from 150mm to 75mm with mg port and other nerfs.
Praying for the day that i can shred a somua with a scimitar frontally
it’s true the tank is very strong i just dislike that they false advertisement as 150mm armor which was not the true values.
2 Likes
in its current state its fine at its current BR. However being able to do horrible things in a incorrectly underarmoured scout tank will be fun
1 Like