It’s not the matter of being displeased with Greece addition, it’s amazing that i don’t have to grind Fr*nce for Rafale. The problem is that the addition of Greece will be used as an excuse to ignore Israeli designs, what i mean is, for a tank that was specifically designed to battle against soviet exports it suspiciously can be front penned by T72. The tank in game is missing so much and it’s been like this for ages, just from the top of my head: Armor, spall liners, LAHAT, Iron Vision, SLERA, m
338 anti-ERA capability and weight, Merkava’s fat turret protection has less armor than on some early cold war tanks. I don’t have problem with the addition of Greece, i have problem with what that signifies.
2 Likes
Merkavas armor problems exist of years if they wanted to do what you say they would put Greece as a subtree years ago. The Leopard 2HEL will not effect the Merkavas in any way the assumption that the devs will not fix the armor after 4 years because an actually armored tank got added its a guess. For me personally they will never fix it because they don’t want to . If they wanted to they would have done it.
The day they say “We wont fix Merkavas armor because the Israeli TT has a Leopard” you will be right until then you just make assumptions
1 Like
even without Greece they would ignore that as they did the last 4 years, Greece has nothing to do with this things
1 Like
So it’s a coincidence that they added some variant of Leopard to France, Italy and Japan and then proceeded to ignore main TT’s MBT?
3 Likes
People need a scapegoat to be mad at gaijin over something that has nothing to do with the issue.
some of the best top tier tanks
what else should they add? The Ariete is a 12.3
Benelux is a subtree and the Leclerc are good tanks
when? France is getting the EMBT this update, i don’t thing there is anything else for Japan, and Italy has next gen stuff
2 Likes
Didn’t they said that the addition of Greece will fill holes in Israeli tree like rank 9 jet? Not directly, but sure sounds like they just refuse to do actual work.
yea and there is nothing Israeli for rank9
High skill floor, no armor can be penned with 50 cal.
Armor?
Ah yes, crap Leclerc tower on somewhat properly modeled leopard hull.
You can sneeze at these tanks and they’ll be dead, the only reason somebody would have high stats on these is because they are actively trying to play them which means that they are somewhat experienced. You can literally be paralyzed from waist down and perform well in T series. Leopard and Abrams are somewhat comparable but higher skill floor.
They literally made a whole topic to “prof” that Abrams hull aint that good, i don’t wanna hear about balancing when it’s enough that Solovyov will scratch his bum and they’ll add more armor on T series.
don’t you want domestic opinions?
no, too many people play Japan nowadays Japan has more games in the Type 10 and TKX than the STRV 122B+ only China has more games than Japan (except the big 3 of course)
still the Abrams is the best tank in the game currently
You’re missing the point, what makes EMBT good is Leopard, and it’s still worse that OG Leo.
still remains that France is getting a domestic MBT this update
In ESports lobbies sure, but in actual game the reds be rawdogging without viagra. In my region with my MM even the most braindead of soviets manage to almost always win while me and others have to sweat to compete, tis not fun.
If you go by stats that the Merkava be doing very well too, i dare you to say that Leo and Merkava can compete as it stands.
And France’s domestic part is still bad. You’re missing the point. Imagine if both parts of EMBT were good. Even with my personal bias against France’s tank it is insulting to anybody with ability to think that a coalition of nation which consists of first and second world countries in all their years of battling against the same country dyed in red had never learnt to make armor that specifically would be effective against the only tank they are expecting to fight against and which they captured and analysed.
America dominates, Russia has the second worst winrate
that’s because few play Israel and because few play it gaijin doesn’t really cares. Israel is the TT with the least premium sales. And that’s why they added Greece to make more players play it and they have succeed on that
no they not, Yes Leclerc’s need some improvements but they are good tanks
Maybe we do have enough people to start protesting 🤔, a community outcry is the best way i can see to make gaijin fix the armor of Merkava tanks, since gaijin only addresses situations when they get dire,
Like how people did with the armor of the Abrams
1 Like
These numbers represent reality as much as speeches of Greta Thunberg. I play, or at least used to play, a lot and majority of my games against the reds were lost even if they were genuinely braindead, i’m not claiming i’m not bad at game but it’s statistically impossible to lose that many games, at some point i had to have good teammates. Also you contradict yourself just like Israel’s WR is inaccurate due to low amount of players so is with soviets with massive amount of players at different stages of degeneracy.
That’s the point, imagine if Merkava was represented well, bias aside, it’s the most unique tank, it was made for one country’s personal needs with no export in mind. Imagine if it wasn’t a driving target but had a spot in meta, or at least a side-grade, why would i want to play another Leopard with Rafale, might as well play France if one seeks uniqueness, Israel even if it’ll have Jericho site for ground vehicle will still be played less just because, first: it’s Israel, and second: you have to actively want to play it to unlock it as it’s not unlocked from start.
If compared to aluminum can, then sure.
First, lol as if that ever worked. And now it’s against TOS and can result in a ban, no free speech for ya.
And second, there are not enough players who are bothered. The tourist sheep will still buy GE and Premiums no matter what while the minority of people who care can rot in dust. It’s like that Ford Pinto situation, it’s cheaper to loose loyal paying customers but gain a herd of short term buyers.
2 Likes