Man did you don’t see the witing on the Jet Mirage F-1CG
Seems to me you look for whatever you like
Using AIM-9P because had them on Stock and preferable them don’t meen they can’t use Magic 1 and 2 later on this same with 530 radar missile don’t taking them on patrols not meen then can’t use them in reality
Aim9P
Down looking 530 Matra IR
yea sure they were compatible but never varied them because they didn’t have too a the Mirage 2000 EG came to service, the F.CG used AIM-9B , AIM-9J, AIM-9P-2 and AIM-9P-4
wow the proves everything, give the F.1CG Mavericks and Sparrows immediately.
its a museum they put them there because of space not because the F.1CG used them
This Negativity dude
Ability too carry them and use them if is time of need is a proof what they use because of stock and for interceptions have nothing to do with ability of the Jet it’s self
Gaijin can do whatever they like it’s they game.In the end they don’t care
The Matra R.550 Magic I short-range air-to-air missile was purchased by Greece in 1974. [1]
Here is how the procurement and usage of the Magic missile series evolved within the Hellenic Air Force (HAF):
The Magic I (1974): Greece initially acquired the Magic I alongside its order for the French Dassault Mirage F1CG fighters following the Cyprus crisis in 1974. However, because the F1CG fleet was primarily adapted to carry American AIM-9 Sidewinder missiles, the Magic I saw limited operational use compared to its successor. [1, 2, 3]
The Magic II (1986): Under the “Talos” defense contract signed in 1985 for the newer Mirage 2000EG/BG fleet, Greece placed a major order for 360 Magic II missiles in 1986. These upgraded, infrared-guided missiles became a staple dogfighting weapon for Greek Mirage fighters stationed at Tanagra Air Base. [1, 2, 3, 4]
If you are researching Greek fighter jets or missile inventories, would you like details on the newer MICA or Meteor missiles that replaced the Magic series, or information regarding the timeline of Greece’s Mirage fleet?
Google it too possible you wil find somthing usefool like Gaijin did
in the sources i couldn’t find anything about Greece getting thrm in 1974 instead i found that
" Mirage F1CGs were armed with the AIM-9P missile, rather than the more commonly used R.550 Magic, and could carry four AIM-9Ps, rather than just two"
And as i said before
Yes by gaijin standards it could get them but irl they never carried them
Then what about stuff like the Mowags Switzerland made? The Dutch Fokkers? The Turkish-Indoneasian Harimau?
Not to mention, more trees allow domestic made/modified vehicles and specialised export vehicles to have more of a spotlight.
Yeah, no. I’m against ‘proposals’ in all but very specific and biased examples.
Because otherwise literally every nation gets everything.
I think all israeli players agree, i prefer we got nothing instead of pure copy paste, this doesn’t solve anything. Until now we haven’t got any news on the armor of our Merkava tanks being fixed, instead of giving israel a leopard that no one asked for, fix the armor of the Merkava’s the Namer’s and the Eitan
Give us something actually unique, not just copy paste, and fix the armor of the israeli tanks
yes me too, that’s why i am open only to the Leopard 2A5 that won
I’m literally so frustrated with these devs, they refuse to fix the armor of all the Merkava tanks, Namer’s included, just to give us copy pasted bs that we don’t want
Who is we
Also where
Absolutely, they need to fix the armor of the Merkava’s immediately!
We, Israel players, we play Israel for, you guess it, Israeli vehicles Not for a Leopard 2, i can already see that Gaijin will use this as an excuse to not fix the armor of the Merkava tanks, same with the Namer and the Eitan
Idk maan, seen many Israel mains pleased with the addition of Greece into the techtree, or many
Saying how they will start playing Israel cause of the addition.
It’s not the same for everyone.
I really doubt that’s the case, either way that’s not the main issues Israel has but many of you are too obliviously fixated on the merks armour to realize that.
What other issue would be worse than our top tier 12.7 MBTs armor being weaker than a a sherman jumbo? The Merkava’s need their armor fixed ASAP, they’re our Main battle tanks, it’s like the “top prise” for grinding the israeli tree, it’s a issue that needs to be prioritized
And i’m talking about ground, and please don’t even say “oh there’s too many magach’s”
“Oh please, don’t point at one of the biggest problems of the techtree” lmao. Whatever pleases you I suppose.
I sure LOVE playing the same tank till top tier
(Least played techtree btw, and by a lot)
It’s not the matter of being displeased with Greece addition, it’s amazing that i don’t have to grind Fr*nce for Rafale. The problem is that the addition of Greece will be used as an excuse to ignore Israeli designs, what i mean is, for a tank that was specifically designed to battle against soviet exports it suspiciously can be front penned by T72. The tank in game is missing so much and it’s been like this for ages, just from the top of my head: Armor, spall liners, LAHAT, Iron Vision, SLERA, m
338 anti-ERA capability and weight, Merkava’s fat turret protection has less armor than on some early cold war tanks. I don’t have problem with the addition of Greece, i have problem with what that signifies.
Merkavas armor problems exist of years if they wanted to do what you say they would put Greece as a subtree years ago. The Leopard 2HEL will not effect the Merkavas in any way the assumption that the devs will not fix the armor after 4 years because an actually armored tank got added its a guess. For me personally they will never fix it because they don’t want to . If they wanted to they would have done it.
The day they say “We wont fix Merkavas armor because the Israeli TT has a Leopard” you will be right until then you just make assumptions
