yes it had
it did carry them
Its a F-4E AUP, A-7H/E and F-16 weapon
but yea Exocet could have come in the previous update and we should see the SCALP as it wouldn’t be broken or anything as it can carry only one
yes it had
it did carry them
Its a F-4E AUP, A-7H/E and F-16 weapon
but yea Exocet could have come in the previous update and we should see the SCALP as it wouldn’t be broken or anything as it can carry only one
Are you perhaps too busy with Copy n pasting vehicles for israel?
PS account transfer to PC hasnt been avaliable for almost 2 and half years.
Can you at least say if you have made ANY progress at all about “automating” system for transfer, or are you too busy with adding 3 unique vehicles and other being copy n paste.
A-7H was a simplified version . It never got ugraded. In 1993 Greece got their A-7E with LANA pods and capabilities. The 7H version never had them. It’s the basic 70s aircraft. Instead of upgrading them they bought the Ex-USN 7Es.
Yeah , my mistake on that… But in fact Scalp shouldn’t be OP at all at our days.
Yo, israel still lacks a Leopard, waiting for that addition.
You left out the best part about copypaste premiums: they don’t give any player a power advantage over F2P players, other than having more options in lineups. You’re paying to support the game and in return you get a cool cosmetic, an extra lineup choice, SL and RP earning efficiency, but not competitive power. In an ideal world, every premium would be copypaste.
And ideally a copy of a domestic design
Since so many player use premiums, especially at ranks VII-VIII, it’s nice when there’s at least some variety and distinction between the nations, where possible
This is how a lot of C+P additions are nowadays, which does annoy me.
In many cases, they’re using updated models for the C+P premiums, so I don’t understand why they don’t go all the way to model the differences while their at it. Considering how outspoken against duplicate vehicles a lot of the player base is, I think that would go someway in improving their public image.
You are the first french main i’ve seen happy about it.
I know one that said he was going to quit the game because of this update.
Keep it up man!
Just passing by to mention how much I like that you’ve started adding camouflage net options for regular tree vehicles!
I’m glad I foresaw this long ago, hahah.
I’ve only got Sabra left, which will be easy. I always imagined they would want to give that line a Top Tier vehicle, and when Greece was announced in a Community Disclosure, I knew this was goin to happen :P
Someone else mentioned it - but was also irrelevant to what was being said. They want better servers, that takes money, and copy/paste vehicles make the most profit to get something like that, and conserve money when added to tech trees for it.
Also - [quote=“AurenKarach, post:214, topic:350995”]
they don’t give any player a power advantage over F2P players
[/quote]
That’s not entirely true. For example - let’s take the infamous BMPT, which while not a full on copy paste, is a close one. Sure - there’s one in the tech tree, arguably a better one with the stupid things it’s added armour does, that you can work towards for free. However in Ground Arcade I know your limited to 3 spawns - and by being able to buy a second one, in the off chance you get destroyed in one, you now have a second one you can spawn in, plus any backups - meaning you can spend the whole match using one of the most broken vehicles in the game. If they put a version of the Su-30 at the same 13.3 as the premiums in Arcade - while it’d force them to actually play 13.3 instead of 13.0 (cause you can get them into lower BR in Arcade) would open up the ability to spawn 2-4 times in one of the most broken aircraft at it’s BR. A copy paste is just as powerful as it’s copy - no one will care if something super weak or that’s relatively balanced is a copy paste, but it’s a problem that will also unfortunately sell well if it’s an OP one.
In an ideal world - not every premium would be copy paste, every premium would be properly balanced - and not locked behind gimmicks like gamble boxes permanently or the excessive paywalls in the market. With the problem starting to seem like they are doing what to many gaming companies are doing and relying purely on stats something has - and contrary to popular belief numbers do lie, more so if read incorrectly and without context. Case in point - we could all be here complaining that the Su-30 premiums are overpowered, but they have constantly refused to move them, even stating recently they did not want to put them against stronger opponents, yet just moved the F-16ADF up to 13.7 when it gets only the 6x ARH missiles that aren’t even as good as what the Su-30’s get, which can also bring 4x additional IR missiles and ground ordnance. So they could be looking at stats that on paper are lets say 45% WR and barely a 2-1 K/D because enough people with zero experience in the game or close to it bought them and are getting smoked in them to cancel out the average and better players that are running up 6-0, 10-0, 20±0 K/D games, and winning most of them (but possibly offsetting due to Su-30’s on the other team). On paper that they use - it’s maybe doing average, or even kinda weak, but in reality in use - it’s one of the most OP platforms out there.
I’ve bug reported it. As for the rest, those remain technically compatible and cannot be removed.
LANA is not compatible …since you don’t have the upgrades in the cockpit you need to utilize it. Digital HUD etc.
About Shrikes … still it didn’t ever had what it needed to use them. It didn’t have specialized RHAW or external targeting receiver.
BUT even if Greece didn’t ever have Shrikes , A-7E was technically capable, because they were ex-USN , they were wired etc. to use the weapon. Also, technically as much as it can use Shrikes, it could use HARM as well. The 7E , which was upgraded as much as the USN ones were in '93.
7H NEVER got upgraded , it was a 70s plane.
I’m super glad that all this Greek stuff is Copy Paste. I still have no need to research anything in the Israeli tree as you get the only unique aviation type at the very start of it (S199).
Wrong.
Subtrees were a huge mistake. Wish this could have been rolled back. Its meh. Small and minor nations getting pumped up and suddenly are military powerhouses. The very same few units get copypasted over and over again.
It should have been remained the way it was. Just nations with viable tech trees should have been introduced. Single vehicles should have been given to the countries of origin or tech ownership.
This “country X belongs to country Y” leads to disaster.
Armor layout from strv
Well alot missing that are arleady in game
Not to mention Mirage F-1 with Aim-P only that huge mistake first , they prefer using Aim-P and but have ability to use Magic and they use them as well.And Centre pilon Matra 530 as well.
Second F-1 and Mirage 2000 in Greek Air Force have special modification to use 4xIR Missile not 2x

Third F4 Phantom II have HUD
Where:
Leopards
AMX-30s
AMX-10P
Marders
BMP
Pz-2000
ASRAD-HELLAS on M998 Hummer with FIM-92 missile
M109 Basicly from A1 to A5 all version
BMP with Zu-23-2 turret modification
F-86D
F-84G
F-5A
F-5A/B
T-33 Shooting Star
Possible Premium Vechicles Trial Tested for Service :
Leopard 2A5 winner of competition
M1A2 Abrams
Leclerc EAU
Challenger 2E
T-80UE and Ukrainian T-84 <—yes was tested
G91R/4 <—Tested Trials
All are and was in service + many more like Tow’s


If you know more feel free to add them
Some of them will be good Addon for Israeli like AMX-10P AA is 6.3 BR in france
But Mirage F1 with 2 AimP missiles 11.3 BR it’s a joke overall huge mistake,same as no HUD on F4
AMX-30 was first version upgraded too D later on upgraded but B2 and given to Cyprus

M48A5 MOLF exist too but Israel have so many of them this one had 105mm cannon with LRF and Thermal overall ubgraded engine and so on
no? only in the last years was the consideration but they stic to the 4 AIM-9P-4 loadout
absolutry not??
and the F.1CG does get 4 AIM-9P in the dev server
Ask F-16 Turk pilot