AH-1F is at 9.7 and will be matched to higher tier heli PVE, and everything else is at 8. something, give us something at 9.3 in Aracde BR, please
1 Like
You mean you want something like AH-1Q or AH-1T being added to US Heli tech tree？
demanding a helicopter for the nation with one the most helicopters in the game, quite selfish arent you?, there is a lot of nations who are lacking in certain helicopters even when options would be available, why should US get more when the just got the AH-6M, OH-85D and MH-60L DAP, that is already a whole new ass heli tree. And here you are demanding even more. Seriously get a grip, think about stuff first before you blurt them out
Maybe the thing you should be asking is to move AH-1F down to 9.3 in arcade instead
America isnt really in need of helicopters in that area
nah that wont be possible, compare it to the german BO 105s, the AH-1Fs capability are a good bit better it is to strong for 9.3
Comparing the two AH-1F does not look that much better than the BO
The main differences i see is
slightly lower speed
flares instead of IRCM
No internal gun
And no CCIP
Am i missing anything?
Regardless i dont think it would cause too much issue being moved down to 9.3 in specifically arcade for the sake of heli PVE
This would not affect ground RB at all
Would just be easier to make 3 brackets for heli pve like its been suggested multiple times over the years, queue time argument bs doesnt work anymore.
u forgot the better scalos missles , while the tow is 3.75km range and the hot 4km, the tow 2 is faster has eccm, more penetration and explosive mass. Besides that you named quite a few things the internal gun and CCIP alone are a huge matter. If i aint wrong u actualy wont find any CCIP on a helicopter under the br of 9.7, because hydra spam with ccip is very strong as well. CCIP propably is the biggest factor
ECCM means literally nothing in heli PVE
And 100mm difference in penetration isnt likely to matter much either
The internal gun is super inaccurate and basically useless for most things
CCIP is the only thing that matters alot
And I just tried a PVE match with the AH-1F and its brutal going against 11.7s and rolands
This is what should have been done a year ago but hey gaijin be gaijin
Heli PVE uses arcade br and it matters for arcade ground battles, they need to be balanced for that as well
that i wont deny, had to use my mi 24, wasnt a nice experience either
Last i recall Ground arcade uses preset vehicles for air and not custom loadouts like ground RB
Gaijin can easily just limit the spawn presets for the AH-1F
Because top bracket is balanced around 11.0+ helis with 8km or greater ATGM range.
well i did say “give something” not “Give something new”
and what should they give you at that br? there is no 9.3 heli america used in the game
so, dear dear players, the one who casts Heli. it is interesting how in the nation of the USSR there is not a single TEDDY at the level of BR 9.3 to 9.7, but all of them are at BR10, which is sometimes unplayable. It is also interesting that from model V to model P heli flies at 311 km/h in the base, only one model 35M lita in the base only 275 km/h, so why does this model not move from BR 10 to BR 9.7 position? what makes this model better than the others and at the same time it has the lowest speed?
another thing is that the only model D is in the Italian nation at BR 9.3 and in order to have one, everything has to be tweaked from the ground up, because neither the plane nor the tank of Italian nationality is in federal research.
so I suggest that one model from the nation of the USSR be reassigned to the smallest BR 9.x
buddy, the speed for helis is the smallest deciding factor, it pretty much doesnt matter at all
it all depends on the armament which the mi 24 series takes a massive amount of
so its not going down in br
so the weaponry is almost the same as 24/35 and if you patch the Heli then from BR 10 it is unplayable than at BR 9.0 or compare it yourself ? and if you look at the firepower, half of the things are missing in the M model, and it could be put together better. otherwise, the P model has more firepower, but some of them don’t have to be there either, players choose the firepower according to their own preferences. I probably only use bombs rarely when I deploy rockets. so tell me why not put some of these models on BR 9.X
The weaponry between those 2 is completly differenr.
35 gets access to iglas, atakas and has a thermal imager and able tonlock targets.
Its has a way stronger armament then the mi 24s
Thats just completly wrong, the M model carries way better guided missles can target better with thermals and cam lock targets.
The P model only gets useless gun pods which are completly ineffective either way.
Yes and br always depends on the strongest loadout.
Because br doesnt shift depending on loadout.
The Mi-35M is way stronger because of its guided ammunition.
While the Mi-24 at 9.7 is already realy strong because of the amount of dumb rockets it has and fpr 9.7 the strongest guided ammunitions with the shturms