What do you even mean?!
1 Like
Bf 110 G-2 ONLY ground realistic BR (not air) 3.7 → 3.3 Gaijin themself inteded that for a time, befor they split Air and Ground BRs. The 37mm Gun is just not all that usefull with only H-Pzgr. except against the most heavy targets. Tho the Pzgr.18 could help in general.
Also if they would add the ability (and fix) the 15mm Mg 151/15 with 4x guns and H-Pzgr. would also add an interesting straver.
1 Like
Pz IV Ausf.E 2.0 → 1.7. Compared to the Ausf.C it only gets some more hull armor and some minor side armor, the Ausf.F1 also sits at 2.0, there is no reasone to even play E, when your sides and back can even be penetrated by Cal. .50. and the front turret by 20mm from even range.
XM800T to 8.7 so its fighting other paper thin AFVs and not just being a more toxic fox
1 Like
The Maus should honestly go down to like 6.3. It can be reliably front penned by a t-34-85. It shouldn’t be at the same br as things with laser rangefinders and apfsds. I don’t even have it I’ve just killed too many with t-34-85’s.
bait?
3 Likes
In a full downtier it can see atgms
TKX type10 TKX(P) Reload time has been reduced to 3 or 3.5 seconds，TKX family in 12.7 armor too thin,and TKX can in 3s over reload time.M1 Abrams now can 5s,but have thicker armor,TKX armor can be DM53 M829A2 breakdown.
1 Like
And? Neither of the 6.7 ATGM tanks are any good.
3.0s can face HEAT-FS with 400mm of pen, and there is 240mm pen HEAT at 3.0 too.
I refuse to believe that the maus would be balanced at any BR below 7.7.
1 Like
Maybe if it got the UFP from a production model and not the single prototype with the 60mm frontal armor lol. As it stands it is a free kill to any 85mm gun or larger, or even 76mms if they get decently close.
J7W should move to like 4.0 and even then it might still be ass.
Exactly there’s things that can pen the maus all the way down at 3.0, but at 7.7 everything can pen it. Only in a full downtier does it even sorta act like a heavy tank and even then most things can still at least trap shot it if not just pen it.
It’s reload is like 4 sec, 80 mm armor as A TANK DESTROYER, and just overpowers everything at 4.7
Everything can pen it? Not true. Frontally, 10% of 7.7/8.0 tanks can do anything. Side on is a different story, but tanks that have early HEAT or still fire APBC shells can’t do much against it.
Tank destroyers, by nature, have strong frontal armour and weak sides. Also fairly certain it does not have 80mm; that would be more in line with the Pz IV/70 or maybe Jagdpanther (not sure which).
1 Like
Its reload is definitly not 4 sec. And its armor is 60mm angled at 50°.
Sherman Jumbo (RB): 5.7 → 5.0
literally unplayable at 5.7, in uptier you just play the role of a harmless free kill because its armor is non-existant against 6.0+ guns and its gun cant deal any damage to these tanks either. Jumbo should NEVER face 6.3 tanks, especially in rb.
It should have lower br in realistic compared to arcade, because its ballistics is also way worse than any tank it is playing against.
Also M-51 should be 7.0 at least.
HSTVL needs to be given a crate of ammo
1 Like
lol.
What does being a tank destroyer have to do with it?
xm803, mbt-70/kpz-70
apfsds literally the worse at its BR, armor is basically paper when met with apds/apfsds, heatfs also can pen some spot but it also suffer when atgm say hello. The only thing that its good at is mobility but then when it 1 to 1 its counterpart it just suffer
lower its rb br to ab br which is 8.7 for xm and 9.0 for the 2 mbts