576 is bad and a 5 second reload doesn’t make it up for it when I have to aim a precise spot while anyone can just autopen me.
However, I would gladly go for a reload buff and keep the same round, that’s a good solution. But atm it’s not equal to the others.
Careful you’re at it again …
Disingenuous. You already know it’s not related to France in particular like at all lmao.
On my phone atm can’t use reverso lol but seems like a really smart word
With all these new darts people talk about, it’s like people talking about adding AIM-9X to just one or 2 top tier planes
Are you trying to justify Gaijin’s horrible balancing system?
If this is true, then no, SHARD shouldn’t be added.
However, i’ve also heard from multiple people that it’s comparable to DM53, so I don’t really know.
Last I remeber the SuperBias, Lorraine, and Somua aren’t the Leclerc.
Not at all, just telling the simple truth. If you want to pretend I’m some sort of devil’s advocate and I am endorsing Gaijin’s balance decisions… think whatever you want. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
Some said above that Gaijin tends to tone down the numbers as M829A2/DM53 have allegedly similar performance IRL as SHARD, but I doubt Gaijin will underrepresent French’s performance as they basically lack technological depth to play around for future additions, SHARD might be one of if not the last APFSDS they can get without resorting to NATO-standardized shells.
Just making sure, you never know.
I think some sacrifices can be made for balance.
Huh…
Shit… Must have been a while since I last played France
I am honestly fine with all the Leclercs barring the MSC getting SHARD but they need to add the new modules to the Leclerc like they did the Abrams T-series and leopard. (As well as all the other tanks that still don’t have them of course)
As much as i hate the new module system i hate that they are adding it to only a select few vehicles at a time even more. either you add this new system to everybody at the same time or dont add it at all.
Sources say L27A1 On the Challenger 2 can penetrate 700 mm RHAe at 2000 n range, but it doesn’t do anywhere near that when calculated using Gaijin’s formula. Whatever penetration numbers you see written down are pretty meaningless when it comes to determining in-game performance.
Has anyone actually plugged the numbers for SHARD into the formula to see what its performance would be in game?
Astute observation skills.
Almost as if I didnt say they are Leclerc, but said that some people called them overtiered at numerous occasions, and after trying them im skepcital about claims of Leclerc not being on par with other top tier MBTs.
I still highly question those numbers either way.
They certainly werent quite tested like the norm.
Else the change to the rheinmetal 120 L/55a1 just wakes not enough sense. Besides logisticaly