tell me you didn’t read a word without telling me you didn’t read a word.
10 Likes
“The british recieved the Bison”
- India is subtree in British tree and uses the MiG-21Bison.
“italy recieved a MiG-29”
- Hungary is a subtree in Italian tree and used MiG-29.
“germany recieved its mig-29s”
- Germany is a tree and used MiG-29s.
“Finland recieved MiG-21”
- Finland is a subtree in Swedish tree and used MiG-21.
You see what the common correlation is between them? They are either subtrees or trees.
“but having a Islamic state of Iran F-14A in the USSR tech tree is suddenly “unreasonable” to ask for?”
- Yes it is unreasonable to ask for a plane that has nothing to do with USSR for USSR tree when Iran is not in any way represented in USSR tree, thus according to Gaijin rules and simple logic it will go to US tree, since its a US plane.
Please do note, I took no stance on your other statements, purely focused on your logic behind vehicle placement.
But also, USSR has received interesting events/premiums, but since interesting is highly subjective, I guess you are gonna claim Obj 272 for example is not interesting at all.
4 Likes
You can see ussr players are jealous about not getting something that doesn’t belong to them. yall cry about it :)
4 Likes
Doesnt mean they wont receive more vehicles in the future
Ground has nothing to do with air in this context. quite personally that whole side of the game can die in a ditch tomorrow and I wouldn’t care.
what I do care about is the fact that by the logic you yourself mentioned, the USSR has in it rappresented 95% of the islamic states alliance (egypt, syria etc.), of which the Islamic State of Iran is very much part of. the fact that gaijin has chosen to use the F-14A With the R-27 modification implies the vehicle that has been added to the game has already went through the issue of the US refusing to sell any more arms to Iran, therefore further implies that the F-14A we’re getting in game is the one actively participating in the Iran-Iraq conflict, of which Iran was against the US.
by extention, it makes it a vehicle used by a US adversary, appear in the US tech tree. and the only logical place a US adversary would go to, that is part of the Organisation of the Islamic Conference , and that was actively used with Russian weaponry, is the USSR tech tree.
4 Likes
I mean ground cannot be excluded when it served with same logic as air is in terms of premium and event vehicles. They establish precedent which in no way is separate from air.
My logic for vehicle placement had nothing to do with any USSR/Russia/etc imperialist agendas, but simply where it belongs to. My logic represented in the response,
Vehicle which nation representative has no subtree/tt ingame → most suitable tree
- i.e. in this case US tree since the plane is inherently American of origin and the only thing related to USSR is one missile.
Vehicle which nation representative has subtee/tt → its own subtree/tt
- i.e in case of India, South Africa, Hungary, BeNeLux, Republic of China and Finland. The vehicles operated by these nation, in any case belong to the tree the respective nation its part of.
It is established fact that Iran is not a subtree or a tt at this current moment so in accordance with gaijins logic too, the most suitable nation gets it, which in this case is USA.
1 Like
Well maybe because vehicles of said nations are Russian??? unlike American F-14A…
2 Likes
But neither India, nor Pakistan, for that matter, Are “subtrees”.
Britain has one subtree, which is South africa. India is inherently NOT a subtree of britain.
yet britain recieved both a T-90 (which BY YOUR OWN LOGIC presented right now, should be in the USSR tech tree) and a MiG-21 bison (following THE SAME logic).
which are the ONLY indian vehicles in game.
I mentioned the pakistani MBT for a different reason: because the pakistani MBT is prime example of gaijin FOLLOWING the logic it should follow,
while NOT following the logic in regards of britain.
and now NOT following the logic in regards of the US.
2 Likes
it never used Russian weaponry, the R-27s never were able to work with the F-14
1 Like
I’m completely for this being in the US tree, as USSR is a no-go. Though, maybe it would be better to make it an IIAF Tomcat with appropriate camouflage, not an IRIAF one. Even if it gets to keep post-revolution weaponry.
1 Like
what makes you think the Egyptian F-16 will go to the US tech tree, if ever added? lmfao.
actually India is a subtree for Britain iirc @Smin1080p_WT has stated multiple times in this thread alone that it’s a subtree of the UK
2 Likes
Except the fact that India is a subtree of Britain. There’s no rule for how many subtrees a nation can have:
Also worth noting:
2 Likes
IIAF would make it a lot more sense, but it WOULD lose the R-27. as it stands, it is a stark contradiction to warthunder’s own logic of adding vehicles.
2 Likes
Currently there is not an established nation for Egyptian vehicles to reside in. That does.
It can not use the R-27 anyway, so yeah.
First of all it most likely wont be added, secondly it would go to US because its a US aircraft and Egypt doesnt exist as a techtree or subtree in game. Simple as
the fact it got sold to the Imperial state of Iran has nothing to do with the fact that the variant added in game is the one from the Islamic state of Iran.
adding an adversary nation’s vehicle to your own arsenal is like china getting a malasyan F-18 because it can go wherever lol.
but whatever you say.
1 Like