what about the T-80 and Mi28 in Swedish tech tree . who were there only in the tender
Evidently by the number of people excited for this vehicle. It appears it was the correct choice and one there was demand for. It was never going to go anywhere else.
We only plan to introduce one Iranian F-14 to the game currently. Not an early or late. So it will not have time locked loadouts.
8 Likes
As already covered earlier in this thread, “needs” is a worthless term meant to make the subjective “I don’t like that X has Y” sound like something objective.
Ordnance is a balancing tool; its historical timeline and such is irrelevant.
Well, after watching this topic for a while, all i can say is
6 Likes
That’s the tip of the iceberg to be honest
1 Like
“why is my topic suddenly only 200 messages long”
F-14 going to the country that built and operated F-14s, I don’t know why people are so upset.
7 Likes
They are upset because there are similar cases where the country that built it did not get the same treatment
3 Likes
1 Like
The second from top comment on the news post is asking why it’s not going to USSR.
Given the news posts have much more viewership, not sure I agree with your assessment.
1 Like
topic locked in 3… 2… 1…
Depends on what is under the sea : )
its iranian tomcat. not american.
Id recommend also reading the response comment under said comment that also has more likes than the comment in question you are referring too.
9 Likes
What all current subtrees are in the game?
UK: South Africa and India;
Italy: Hungary
Anything else?
BeNeLux
BeNeLux for France.
Finland for Sweden.
7 Likes
Is Finland a sub tt?
Thank you.