pathetic
*Logical
Its a pre-revolution vehicle and pre-revolution purchase (by Iran). Armament doesnt really mean a thing as it is a balance factor in game
1 Like
not really
Why would it go to Russia? Because of one missile? That…doesn’t make sense. It has three US missiles, the Aim-9, 7, and 54s.
3 Likes
Er yes It’s a US plane there for goes to the US and Iran isn’t a sub
At least in british TT it makes sense through commonwealth, of which india was member for longer.
Hell india was commonwealth nation long before BRICS existed.
5 Likes
technically also Hawks so 4 missiles lol
Why is the t-90 in the UK tree and not in the Russian tree? Since India used to be a UK colony and now has a lot of Russian equipment?
Likewise, Iran now has good relations with the USSR so why not give it that F-14?
Stupid logic Gajin
2 Likes
Then F-14 should be in the pre-revolution condition. Without R-27 and with pre-revolution identification marks.
cause gaijin stated that india is a british sub tree thats why
1 Like
Because India is a sub Iran is not
1 Like
And the fakour 90s
India is a sub tree nation of the British tree like South Africa. It’s vehicles will be deployed there.
8 Likes
I think that’s the biggest problem I have with Gaijin…well one of them. But yeah. The fact that they claim balance when it suits them and then claim historical accuracy when it suits them.
Out of curiosity, did they manage to get the R-27’s working? I thought that pre or post revolution the missiles never worked.
Can we make Iran subtree of Russia? ofc not
That’s just a skin and can be changed. Camos and armament dont mean a single bit for vehicles in game as they can be changed or added for balance or other reasons.
1 Like
1 Like
Oh well guess what? Back in the days Britain was a part of Roman Empire, so lets merge France, Germany and Britain with Italian TT
3 Likes
How many times do we have to say India is a sub ?