???
Are you on crack?
Sweden was added as a new nation. It got its vehicles. Same as any other nations. I agree there are double standards when adding vehicles, but they are the exception and not the rule most of the time.
The event is very clearly meant not meant to make the entire game for you for free, which is why they at least want you to spend ALOT of time ingame to make up for it. please stop crying about it and thinking you’re entitled to everything for free.
It was already pathetic when you cried about the chinese TD not being worth much.
Good ol’ “free Abrams” narrative.
“Can’t criticise overly excessive grind because it totally means you just want everything for free”.
If you think it’s healthy to require players to grind for over 5 hours every day for 2 weeks to get a videogame asset, at least don’t try to strawman your way into disregarding perfectly legitimate concerns shared by thousands.
Complete b o l l o c k s
Noone requires people to grind tho. They are free to choose if they want to grind or not. If not they can either GE the stars or then later buy the vehicle on market. Another dumb Spanish Avenger take, no wonder even CCs all you out on being dumb.
Disregard my prior statements suggesting that the coupon grind was too hard!
I just realised I was making the calculations on a 14 day deadline because I was not going to be able to grind for 4 days this time. My subconscious had forgotten about the event actually being 18 days and not 14 xD.
If it hadn’t been for my absence during those 4 days, I would have probably been able to grind this event just fine, with some effort, obviously.
I still think it’s hard, but without the “too” part; doable, which is fitting, considering the reward is 40 GJCs on the short term and potentially more on the long term.
…and some people say that “I am too obstinate to reconsider my positions”, lmao.
Don’t you ever get tired of being this shitty towards someone else who hasn’t done anything to you?
No, cause if your takes are bad you simply get called out for it, just like Razervon does.
To be honest, after Great Britain and Sweden acquired Russian military equipment under far-fetched pretexts, Russia has every right to receive this equipment for itself.
UK didnt recieve russian gear.
India did, which is a subtree of UK.
India is not a subtree of Great Britain. Otherwise, Argentina and Poland could be added to the subtree of Germany. Otherwise, following the example of Great Britain, Iran should be added to the subtree of Russia or China, but not the USA. You can also add North Korea to the USA. That would be funny.
Wrong 💀
It was confirmed by devs in this very thread because people already made the same argument as you.
That’s the neat part.
No.
In time, when Fakour/Sedjil/R-27 been proposed/implemented in F-14 - Iran not be a friends with US for sure.
If you want a IIAF Tomcat, which can be in US tree - it must have only “vanilla” armaments of F-14, which been delivered by US.
Wrong 💀
It was confirmed by devs in this very thread because people already made the same argument as you.
In this case, Iran looks much more organic in the Russian subtree than in the US tree. Iran looks at least stupid in the US tree!
In this case, Iran looks much more organic in the Russian subtree than in the US tree. Iran looks at least stupid in the US tree!
But Iran isnt a subtree.
Iran is currently the same as Canada or Australia.
Canadian ADATS went to UK, but canadian Leopard 1 and Leopard 2 went to germany.
Australian WW2 tanks are in UK, Australian Abrams is in US.
India is not a subtree of Great Britain.
India is indeed a sub tree of Britain. We have confirmed this multiple times.
Once again, if a nation has a designated sub tree, it’s vehicles go to that nation. (EG Indian vehicles like the Bison or Bishma go to Britian)
If a nation has no sub tree, it’s vehicles can go to whoever is most relevant or based on the needs of that nation. In this case, Iran has no sub tree and this is a US aircraft. So it goes to the USA.
They have around 0 rights to it tho
It doesnt matter if its IRIAF or IIAF Tomcat when in the end of the day the vehicle is indeed a Tomcat - US made vehicle exported to Iran and since its a US vehicle it goes to the US tech tree
Iran looks at least stupid in the US tree!
Why, it’s a Tomcat of which atleast two are already in the US tree.
In that case, why won’t the US add it in the form in which the US supplied it to Iran? Accordingly, without Soviet missiles!
How does this not matter?! The US supplied the Tomcat in this form and with this set of weapons?