Missiles have never defined what tree a vehicle goes into.
You can find vehicles with the Magic missile in multiple trees, vehicles with the AMRAAM in multiple trees and vehciles with the R-60 in multiple trees.
Russia has no relation to the F-14 other than the R-27. Which as we have concluded, is not something that defines where a vehicle goes.
Iran has no sub tree. So the vehicle will go to the most applicable nation in game for the aircraft. As this is a F-14 Tomcat, that is America.
Yes, the game has aircraft with identical missiles in different nations, but these nations are not hostile to each other, unlike the US and Iran. This is pure double standards and a step towards even greater imbalance in the game.
Smin has stated before, which is some thing that I agree with, but the US sold Iran tomcats when they were in good relations with them therefore, they are countries that would have good relations
For example, if gaijin decided to add an Iranian Mirage F1 it would probably go to france not america
I want them to introduce what the US actually supplied to Iran when they were in close relations. But not here, the equipment when they are in hostile relations.
In that case, when can we expect Ukrainian Abrams and Leopards in the USSR/Russia development tree? After all, in your opinion, it doesn’t matter what relations the countries have!
Gaijin isn’t going to touch Ukraine probably for at least a year after the current conflict ends. I know that about a year ago our Ukrainian stat card flag was dynamite, but Ukraine is completely irrelevant in this topic.
Depends if gajin decides to add ukraine stuff.
Which propably wont happen.
Thailand can substitute the T-84 as a user
Besides that iran and ukraine arent comparable
Seriously leave it be. You aint winning anything here