Yes, the game has aircraft with identical missiles in different nations, but these nations are not hostile to each other, unlike the US and Iran. This is pure double standards and a step towards even greater imbalance in the game.
Just let it go already omg
Smin has stated before, which is some thing that I agree with, but the US sold Iran tomcats when they were in good relations with them therefore, they are countries that would have good relations
For example, if gaijin decided to add an Iranian Mirage F1 it would probably go to france not america
Then let them add to the game the Tomcat that the US supplied to Iran when they were still friends.
So now you want copy paste instead of a unique modification of a very iconic aircraft?
I’ll never understand this community, one second they want entirely unique event vehicles in in the next second they want copy paste
These are not the largest or most important factors that decide where a vehicle goes in game.
Ultimately this is an American aircraft that was sold by them.
I want them to introduce what the US actually supplied to Iran when they were in close relations. But not here, the equipment when they are in hostile relations.
The US did not supply the aircraft that is added to the game.
Pretty certain its an US F14.
Just like germany git canadian leopards
Or uk got indian chieftains etc
In that case, when can we expect Ukrainian Abrams and Leopards in the USSR/Russia development tree? After all, in your opinion, it doesn’t matter what relations the countries have!
Guess what though… you don’t always get what you want!!
Given has no other nations built F-14s, they kinda did.
The very modification that will be in the game?!
Gaijin isn’t going to touch Ukraine probably for at least a year after the current conflict ends. I know that about a year ago our Ukrainian stat card flag was dynamite, but Ukraine is completely irrelevant in this topic.
The modification of the Canadian Leopards in the German tree are not German operated modifications. This is no different.
Just as out of place as Iran in the US development tree. But nevertheless, we will soon see it.
Depends if gajin decides to add ukraine stuff.
Which propably wont happen.
Thailand can substitute the T-84 as a user
Besides that iran and ukraine arent comparable
Seriously leave it be. You aint winning anything here
i really dont understand why you all are still arguing over this 18 days later.
Most of us aren’t, but one guy is
How soon can we expect modifications of Ukrainian Leopards and Abrams in the USSR development tree?