Also trailers are in-game bias now ig.
It’s a marketing product making Russia look good, it’s part of the general bias experience
Nah it’s a real thing. I’ve watched people pull out the A-10C in 13.0+ sim and be far better off than if they played their F-18s for example. It has insane automation and QoL not to mention the flight model of a literal hummingbird. + MAWS + HMD. The only way to kill one at 12.7+ is to top down from 20k ft just so it can’t multipath. And if you miss? I guess just try to extend from the 9M.
you have almost infinite flares, those should absolutely not be a threat.
vikhrs have terrible pull, A-10C has MAW. You’re ignoring launch warnings now?
sure buddy it still pulls as much as the mica past 1 km where the micas thrust vectoring shines of launch
the point is it gets more energy when launched off bore
8missiles vs 12 where i could shoot down all 8 from any range he shoots at me also while being in the notch
su25sm3 has maws
am laughing at this
Me when I reach and have -5° gun depression living rent free
Have you ever used vikhrs?
they only work against people who don’t do anything about them or helicopters which are too immobile to dodge them
i guess it was good that the americans thought to give a strike aircraft that flies low alt more countermeasures
first nation i ever grinded was russia dude…ik what am saying
“it’s not bias when it’s designed and holds my hand through my preferred tree”
2 Likes
it’s not bias because it’s american.
only RUSSIA can have overpowered stuff. It’s completely impossible that other nations also can have overpowered features. definitely
2 Likes
Russia is just the sacrificial lamb this community attacks when anything goes wrong, calling everything russian bias is so dumb
1 Like
Flashbacks to when redfor’s best aircraft was the artificially nerfed J-10 and sim was 7v1 permanently every game
you have less than 200 games in Russian MBTs…
You have barely any experience playing Russia in grb
You also performed terribly in those MBTs
its insane how other nations have to be kept using tech from the 90s and russia can just get 2010+ equipment fo0r them to be competitive
They do not, all modules are repaired at the same time.
Lies
Go tell NATO to make their IFVs shoot missiles on the move.
Their current modern IFVs are able to do that, but they chose not to implement them ingame. Classic
their darts are superior to Russian darts in every way…
We do not care if we still can’t pen russian UFPs. We want the most modern shells in order to be able to pen them.
There is no point at all having “the best DARTs ingame” if you still have to shoot at russian weakspots. Russian MBTs just need to point and click NATO MBTs to kill them.
In a PvP game, this is not fair.
Not anymore, especially now it’s going to 5.3.
Oh yeah it’s gonna change everything, especially when it still 1 shots everything from 5.0 to 10.0, especially one shoting 6.7 heavy tanks.
Ridiculous argument.
No T-series MBT has proxy HE
??? LIES
T-90M + T-80UK + T-80U-E1 + the other skined T-80U-E1, it’s 4 MBTs for Russia. Lies.
ATGM shells are not that useful.
They’re useful against helicopters standing still + low flying CAS.
Yeaaaah sure the famous timing problem
How strange the timing problem happens the way it does, where it’s the Russian side that wins, and not NATO… how CONVENIENT
This isn’t bias though. This is balanced reality. Russia didn’t/couldn’t design/produce equivalent equipment until about the 2010s. You’re crying about superiority rn
i love how were are talking about planes and you go straight to i have less matches in tanks…stick to the a10c we were on about
ooooooh nooo the dude that only plays air sim is not good in tanks
If you only play air sim then you would know that redfor has been in the top tier gutter up until this year since the F-14 first dropped.