I’ll do as you coping about this specific statement I did: Ohh boo hoo Leopard 2A7V got nerfed, so why don’t you use the other three Leopard 2 on the tech tree. Why not? They aren’t Meta? Aren’t they a hold W like the Leopard 2A7V Roadrolling everything that it sees ahead?
If you’re acting like a underdog because of a “super nerf” on Leopard 2A7V alone is valid to remove three vehicles from another tech tree is completely invalid and ignoring how busted can be 2A7V’s armor, just don’t act like a 5.7 German player and thing about keeping yourself alive and not coping about a vehicle.
Same as you, I’ll ignore your entire statement and focus on a point that benefits myself and throw the rest in the trash:
They’re good vehicles: well protected and good weaponry.
Sweden is same as Germany, Russia has easy pixel hunting, Abrams has BS turret ring and massive block in center of its turret, UK has weak asf cannon barrels, and idk much about Chinese tanks cause they’re rare. I just shoot their hull and they die.
I guess you aren’t even going to bother to actually address my point then?
If you’re acting like a underdog because of a “super nerf” on Leopard 2A7V alone is valid to remove three vehicles from another tech tree is completely invalid and ignoring how busted can be 2A7V’s armor, just don’t act like a 5.7 German player and thing about keeping yourself alive and not coping about a vehicle.
Do you have anything else to offer here apart from a blatant strawman argument? Or do you ever plan on actually reading the context, because your whole passage is, quite honestly, a result of your lack of comprehension.
Same as you, I’ll ignore your entire statement and focus on a point that benefits myself and throw the rest in the trash:
The latter part of your “statement” added nothing of essence, it didn’t need to be addressed in any way. It was a pure cope-out about how, because, Leopard 2s are good vehicles, Germany doesn’t deserve good CAS.
Your username honestly checks out. It’s easier to outright disregard the points made by the other person, especially if they’re hard to properly counter…
Oh btw, why are you, a Russia main who hasn’t played anything other than Russia til top tier (excluding lone premiums like the TAM 2IP), telling people who have played Germany & more, that Germany doesn’t deserve good CAS?
Strv 122s are pretty much just better protected Leo 2s. Also Gajin loves Sweden for whatever reason so yeah they were pretty much assured to get paveways.
Its literally the exact same with german tanks, you are just showing how much of a skill issue you have. Here let me show you how to “pixel hunt”. As long as you dont shoot center mass, you will be fine.
Spoiler
Shoot here and you will always either get a kill or at the least breach, exact same “pixel hunting” as
Turret ring is also an easy spot to kill
UFP is easy as you dont often ricochet because the DM is broken lol
yes, they are a lot better protected, the frontal chassis bounces a ridiculous amounts of shots. So that makes 2a5/pso worse then swedish ones. 2a6 sweden has as well and the penetration is only a tad bit stronger and at top tier basicaly everything is basicaly one shot anyway. At to this the ITO 90M and the CV90120 and you get a way stronger line up,
So you seriously wanna tell me that sweden and germany are equal in their line up when sweden trumps germany at every aspect?