for stuff that has specific numbers available it would be a first for gaijin to do this as far as i am aware
Yeah, its better. that is why it is much higher in br.
It still sucks at its br due to the slow round and very slow reload. But funny to play sometimes, true.
Its not up to you to support or not tho,Gaijin do unrealistic changes to vehicles to be more balanced and not broken,since they can why not do it for a vehicle that cant even shoot further than 40 centimeters?Just add more velocity to it so i can shoot further than 200 to make it usable
its also 3.0 br higher
the petard does have good armour for its BR, even if there are some things that can pen you there are far fewer things that can pen the petard than say a t50
entirely subjective, personally ive had fun in the petard and no fun in the sturmtiger
still asking for you to name one of these changes you keep talking about
I really dont care. I do not support them doing it to anything.
At that point, why even bug report stuff?
1 Like
HSTVL its one of them
Name one,i did
i cant really just take your word for it, you kinda need to say what the change was?
didnt they do something like not give it its higher pen round or something?
Pen values,rate of fire,proxy rounds?
All those things that arent as the IRL counterpart???
Wait,didnt we said that we want real stuff?Why not make it shoot and pen stuff like the irl part?Right…cause it would be broken
They added some stuff later on dont get me wrong on that but they took so much time to add for example the proxy shells
but the vehicle itself aint never gonna be like the irl counterpart
there is a big difference between not giving a tank something and artificially buffing something, one is a sometimes reasonable balancing decision the other is artificially buffing something
i dont recall hearing that. i would need to go look that up. if there is only one mode and it is faster, they should correct it.
whats wrong with the proxy rounds?
what part of the info was wrong? was it the round length or the weight?
1 Like
but they did still add them, how does that support artificially buffing something?
No,it would be broken
If it shoots in 1 seconds and deal the same damage as an Abrams shell,you do understand it would be broken
Pen values and reload rate are still not as irl counterparts isnt it?
So why we have some vehicles that are artificially nerfed but we cant add up slightly more velocity to a petard?
it doesnt deal the same damage as an abrams shell though
i honestly disagree the BR system exists for a reason
as far as i know the increase in pen value people talk about comes from a tested round that had more propellant but damaged the breech
and do you have a source for the increased reload because if you have an actually good source for it then im sure gaijin will be more than happy for you to make a bug report
once again not really sure how this supports you wanting an ahistorical buff to something?
Its legit to a par of a M774 and lacks proper post pen damage like what?
Its only fire mode was 1 sec? then it should be that in game. Gaijin’s fault for adding it.
if they got the speed, length, or weight wrong, it should be corrected.
Something bad happening doesnt mean that its okay to do more bad things.
if it does do identical damage to a 105 or even 120mm round and you have a good source that provides testing data to support this, then bug report it, but it will take time to implement if you do this because it would require a change to warthunder systems as far as i am aware
please give a source for anything you have claimed, it would be great, but hearsay is not a source