There’s also a Type 16 with autoloader we could get. And Japan is developing a new 105mm APFSDS round.
1 Like
I noticed ther radar arm doesn’t have a hitbox. While it is certainly menefitial to the player using it, it can be frustrating for an enemy who loaded some big HE only to see the shell fly right through. Should I report it?
Even if it gets reported it’ll be low priority and take 6 months to a few years to see. T72’s still dont have their turret hatches modeled and gaijin has admitted its not worth modeling the top of some of them iirc.
But this isn’t just T-72’s iirc a lot of tanks dont have them, its just i remember someone mentioning it specifically about the T series.
I doubt we’d see it get changed realistically.
What even counts as high priority? I’d say fixing a barely working machine like the Tan-SAM kai or SPYDER is, but Gaijin apparently doesn’t.
Are there any versions of the Type 10 left to add that are top tier worthy, only being able to spawn 2 MBTs at top tier just sucks. (Apart from the RCWS/APS one)
I think Japan might have the worst top tier lineup in the game, when it comes to what you can spawn
Hopefuly we won’t have to wait too long for the Thai subtree, T-84 could somewhat fix the issue you mentioned. Tho we still would be missing a top tier light tank.
Given the Elde can’t leave spawn on 90% of maps and they admitted the game engine cant model it and have no plans to fix it…
Id say its whatever they decide feels important at the time.
oversigt
Even if they do accept it, it could take years to get it passed and then when it does get fixed you have to hop its done correctly, its why i actively check here and on the bug reporting site for new posts for the Tan sam so i can hopefully get it changed.
1 Like
I hope there will be more Type 90s/Type 10s that have distinct differences between each other. Gonna be honest: I got quite tired of spading the same rather overrated tank all the way around several times. There are still like 2 (?) prototypes of Type 10, but I don’t really want the tt to be filled at the top with tanks like “first model of the third prototype of Type 10 (P)”
I never even spaded the 11.3 TKX. My top tier lineup is F-2A, Type 10, TKX, Fuji, Tan-SAM kai, Type 81, AH-64DJP.
I’d much rather have the Chuta instead of the Fuji tho. The lineup is missing a scout and Type 16 doesn’t havw the firepower to really compete at 12.0.
1 Like
Wait really, do u have a source?
I bring the type 16 to top tier and do fine with it, u just have to utilize weak spots more.
Mybe the type 24/25 could work good to as a scout tank.
Perhaps the 6 wheeled mutant? Idk what rounds it could get though.
unarmored, still hitbox. You are in armor view.
1 Like
yes
3 Likes
Is it safe to assume it’ll get DTC10?
That depends on gaijin
Oplot? Should be compatible with autoloader as Chinese anti armor projectiles are backwards compatible. Old ZTZ96 can utilize DTC-10, too, as projectiles do not have the same Russian “length issue”.
So there should be no technical issue. But still not safe to assume. They could give it any of the other rounds on market that are compatible with older loading mechanisms. Like TAPNA, or Israeli 125 round.
It is a safe assumption for Thai VT-4, though.
I really hope “M60A3 TTS” means M60A3 TIFCS and M163 means the modernized Super Vulcan
3 Likes
What?VT-4 for Japan?
I have to say Gaijin choose a ‘best’ time
1 Like