Two secondary sources, or a single primary source.
The issue with both reports is neither prove that the track radar being M247 is explicitly incorrect, so in gaijin’s mind neither is an actionable report, as nothing is verifiably wrong.
2 Likes
By the same logic, Gaijin should provide a source or their reasoning behind giving it the M-247 search radar.
Not to mention, the stats of the radar in the actual game are not what the x-ray shows anyway, which just proves that the x-ray view is incorrect. That’s the whole point of the bug report, to point out an obvious mistake.
2 Likes
A very large part of the issues people have is exactly this. Gaijin just does things and claims internal sources, but rarely if ever shares them.
3 Likes
On another note, here is one of the few Type 87s that have the scorpion emblem, that we just got in WT, on the cheeks.
And here’s one that has the more modern smoke grenade dispensors.
7 Likes
That has room for some Type 91 Kai…
4 Likes
I also wondered why didn’t Japan put some SAM-2s on their Type 87s, similarly to German Gepards and Stingers, but they probably don’t need to do that as they have the SAM-2s on the Toyota Mega Cruisers.
Anyway, you mentioning the SAM-2 Kai - I did a bug report on the missing kai missiles on the Type 93 and it has been accepted, we might see it one day, hopefully.
4 Likes
Hopefully it won’t go up in br
Shouldn’t really, the flight performance is the same, only difference is IIR seeker, so better performance against low flying and distant enemies.
I put in a bug report for that which was accepted over three years ago now, I don’t have any high hopes at all.
I’m still salty about the NVD nerf
Russian bug fixes:
Hey moderator, i got a dream which said the armour of a T-90 is 800mm, you should change it!
Done! Thanks for reporting this issue!
4 Likes
Meanwhile:
Hey Gaijin! The EF-2000 is supposed to have this high cruise speed at low altitude, here are official sources like the flight manual (ofc declassified) and manufacturer brochure.
Gaijin: That’s a blatant marketing lie. Not a bug. Anyway, here’s the Kh-38MT, this brochure says it’s this good so it must be true.
1 Like
That, we really need independ bug checkers and not these Russian biased people.
1 Like
Ok so what would a Thai ground subtree look like ideally?
Unique
IMO, the most important vehicles (which should represented) are following (roughly sorted by Rank);
- Type 76, Porborkhor 105 Attajhon, FV101 Scorpion, V-150 (90), M41 (Stingray), M60A3 TIFCS, Stingray, BTR-3E1, BTR-3RK, T-84 BM Oplot-T
Ideally, these should also come as some gap fillers;
- M163A1 TVADS, Type 51 (Starstreak), BTR-3E (CSE 90LP), M48A5PI, M425
Perhaps VL MICA, but not sure how to implement it…
Then there are also the meme and chinese origin tanks;
- M60A3 TTS (WERA), Truck w/ M61A1, ATMOS 2000, CEASAR, VN-1, VT-4, Type 62, Type 69-II, Type 69-II (105), FK-3/HQ-22
10 Likes
This aswell
2 Likes
Scorpion my beloved, though personally I want the M163 soooooo bad. The already bare bones 7.3/7.7 line ups really suffer with just the Sub-1-2, and it would work as a backup to the Type 87 at 8.3
2 Likes
it’s already listed
I don’t see a reason against it. Japan could get it via Thailand, China could get it via Pakistan. Everyone would be happy.