That’s fair enough, I do want the more unique modifications they had, rather than whatever Pattons are already in the game and just need a new skin.
2 Likes
Which is also all Thai Pattons, assuming we get add-on armor as modifications.
The M48A5 isn’t in game, so it would be new by itself
M60A1 can get Blazer ERA modification so you can have it both with and without the armor, but you don’t need to add a copy of the unarmored one in the US tree.
M60A3 TTS can have log “WERA” armor modification and be unique, but like the M60A1 can still be used without it to show the Thai tanks without add on armor.
M60A3 TIFCS is a unique Thai modification of the tank, so it’s already unique
3 Likes
As i have brought up before, even the copy-paste Pattons like M60A1 is better than the US version because of FCS upgrade allowing the use of laser range finder same with the M48A5 but this one is not yet in the game.
New magazine from PANZER talks about Modernization Upgrades of the Type 10/Type 90 Tanks.
(The cover photo with RWS is for illustrative purposes only.)
7 Likes
Does all tree known? I heard only about TK-X and this Type 61
in my defence its funny
Yes, they are adding about 8 tanks in the TT.
5 Likes
WOT got Type 61 mod B. and TK-X - 0001 before F-2A in WT
2 Likes
Interesting. I am happy that more Japanese vehicles in seperate trees/nations appear in games.
Sad that it is for console game only and… you know… it is WoT with all problems with this game
Still hope JSDF will apear in Squad. It has like everything what is needed to be added there
1 Like
Okay see id say that is a good opinion but knowing how gaijin works what that means is any unique vehicles will be ignored and will only add copy and paste which i feel diminishes the value of making the subtree unique
Rather get copy-paste “filler” tanks to pad out lineups than nothing, tbh
…Isn’t that the console-only version? I don’t see why people are acting like it’s such a big deal when WG still refuses to port it (and many of the other console-only improvements for the other game) to PC.
Nah what we need a damn decent spaa my dawg I need a radar spaa at top tier please god have thailand have one (or the other asean nations)
Japan could still get the Active Radar Homing version of the Tan-SAM.
…Which is the version that should be at 11.7, instead of Gaijin leaving the IR version up high and dry because… It was doing its job…
1 Like
No uh i mean with a search radar dawg
Agreed, if no domestic or unique vehicles exist to fill a gap then Copy and paste should be used instead.
Finland air is a great example of gaijin literally adding no actual gap fillers and thus ignoring the actual problems with the air tree. I hate when gaijin decides to not actually think when it comes to fixing problems with main TT’s. I just hope the ground additions bolster lineups that are lacking a lot cough cough 8.x
tragic times, thailand lacks any spaa with a search radar built in… tragic times
Not just that, but some Gaijin BR decisions boggle the mind with regard to lineups
Type 87 RCV P at 7.7? Why? The Wiesel is at the same BR, smaller, and gets gen 3 thermals+LRF plus the same autocannon! It should be at 7.3 with the M47, Ho-Ri, and Type 99.
Type 81c now at 11.7? The same BR as the Pantsir… Gaijin, please get someone else in the balancing kitchen, your BRs are burned to a crisp…!
2 Likes
Okay type 87 RCV (p) honestly does better at 8.7, in a full uptier against Germany is when i pull it.
Honestly 8.7 against Germany is the only thing that kept me sane spading it
Also for the nuke on American desert that T55 AM-1 can go **** himself Ho Ri Supremacy!!!
Seriously skip play the RCV against Germany and flank and play like a Rat, uncap objectives and listen and youll do fine.
(Just have to blow your brains out getting the APDS…)
4 Likes
It’s mostly personal bias, but I find Pattons dreadfully boring. Only the later iterations, such as the RISE, are interesting to me.