instead of having a go at the guy wait for him to produce the video to convey what he was stating clearly
Unfortunately, based on previous reports I am highly doubt that this video will be really informative and show issue with the source prooving that it is wrong
This might not be the case, instantly thinking of the worse for someone who’s trying to accurately translate for non Japanese speaker’s it does take time
instantly shutting out information is just blatant ignorance as well as disheartening to people who actually want to give informative knowledge to people
As I said previously, the issue is not with full translating of document but with the inability to make a properly designed report.
The structure “I made a statement about a specific characteristic and attached 1000 pages of machine translation, now find for yourself where it says so” is extremely unpromising. This is something that I want to draw attention to as a very major problem.
In a good report (the same as a video), the problem should be posed and a page/pages from sources should be indicated that describe the data that should be
what is a “properly designed report”?
I see well written reports etc get dismissed as “not a report”
The report what will be useful in understanding for people who accept that reports. It should show the issue and page from source where is written correct information about problem.
Not adding hundreds comments with machine translated document which tbh looks like bug.
I made a simple bug report about missing ordinance on the PG-02 “Not a bug report”
I killed an M18 in CQC with it yesterday. If I had any other tank he woulda died the moment he crested the hill I was hiding behind.
Guy still died to the .50cal. Somehow.
So WOT gets the TKX-0001 while we in War Thunder are forced to play whatever Thai copypaste slop Gaijin gives us (more pattons)

NGL I am looking forward to more pattons…
Of course the missile itself is hardly the issue but rather the launch angle.
And y’know, it wouldn’t be an issue if the missile actually leveled out with my sight with a sense of urgency, instead it decides to take its sweet time unless I force it to dive down, in which it will likely miss my target because I can’t judge how much to pull down when I can’t even see it in my sight.
That looks really good
Honestly Type 60 ATM shines in long range maps.
I mostly used defensive strategy, but some times getting 2-4 kills but quick enough it is being intercepted by mad cas revengers.
Anyone know when the UH-1B is going to get its other set of rocket pods that was listed in the BR change file?
As an Arcade main, I don’t get such luxury as easy long range kills lol
But on the flip side, I have scored a few missile kills on CAS, aided in part by the easier ATGM guidance on controller.
Depends on the Patton. If it’s something Thailand actually used and is interesting, then sure. But if it’s low-effort slop, then no
Admittedly small color photo I found of what I believe to be the T-53-engined Sherman, popularized in the WT community by Mai Waffentrager.
Japanese M4A3 Powered by a T53 Turboshaft Engine : r/Warthunder
If it’s something Thailand used, the Thailand subtree should get it full stop. Otherwise why does the US have 3 (technically 4, but one is a jumbo) different 76 Shermans? Would you call those slop? And why does Japan have so many functionally identical tanks? (Most of the ST-A, ICV/RCV, ST-B and early Type 74)
Honestly, if the Thai T-84bm oplot comes in the next update, I think it will be an interesting addition to the Japanese tech tree with the opposite characteristics to the Type 10. In fact, I’m sure some people are looking forward to its addition!!