General Japanese & Thai Ground Forces Discussion HQ

@lmjapanese8538

If we make Type 10 in-game based on the specification and some official test results, it will be much stronger.

  1. Turret cheek is likely to withstand type 10 AP at 250 m distance IRL.
  2. Mantlet and hull vital section will also provide same protection.
  3. All the structures are made of nanocrystalline steel, which is better than RHA.
  4. Type 10 AP has a self-sharpening effect, which provides extra penetration.
  5. It has more power output at drive sprocket and higher mobility than type 90.
  6. Very capable C4I system, although no any C4I is implemented in WT.

These are already discussed here. JGSDF Type10 Tank/10式戦車
And the correction of armour configuration is already submitted as an issue, although it has not been adopted for 2 years. Type 10 MBT’s Inconsistencies, Thickness and Composition

@Noveos_Republic
Yeah, I see so many people and books confusing modular composite armour and side modules.

I have no idea, never heard about it.

6 Likes

Regarding that, I was rather… how do I say this… naive when I made it. Gaijin has a certain way of working, and I highly doubt that this is enough or good enough for them. Since then, I have learned a lot more, both about how Gaijin operates and about the Type 10 in general. Unless there is direct information contradicting a Gaijin claim, I doubt they will bother to change it.

There are some recent examples of this behaviour as well, specifically the Leopard 2A7V and how Gaijin handled its acceleration. Despite having plenty of information to make an informed estimate, they simply gave up and asked for details that are not public.

With the Type 10, the most likely changes are buffing the RHA to NRHA/HHRHA, fixing CVT/HMT, and maybe reworking the turret armour to remove some of the gaps and broken shapes.

I doubt they will mess with the full armour protection or APFSDS. Gaijin uses LO for War Thunder, so unless we can prove the rod is faster, denser, or bigger, we won’t have a great chance of getting more penetration.

For anyone interested, here are Gaijin’s numbers for APFSDS and armour. Do note that some of these might be outdated for certain shells and tanks.

In short, could people make a better report? Yes, with not too much effort. But will it be accepted by Gaijin and actually added to War Thunder? Probably not, as there is no direct source to contradict the majority of Gaijin’s claims.

6 Likes

I’m not the first, and I won’t be the last, to see Gaijin’s behaviour this way. They only change things if they want to or are forced to, and even then, there’s no guarantee they’ll actually make a change. The CR2 breech changes, Stingers, the 2A7V vs Strv 122, and many other issues are examples of Gaijin’s ignorance or lack of interest/need to fix anything.

Sorry if I sound overly pessimistic, I just have my doubts that Gaijin will do much xD.

4 Likes

Yes, if we had the specification of the mystery “48 ton full armour type 10” that can proof to Gaijin, but AFAIK until now there really haven’t any document (whether unclassified or sekrit) that saying what actually is the “additional armour” was

1 Like

Good luck on this, Gaijin has shown to ignore sources and even if reports are accepted, they’ll likely never be implemented or implemented in a very botched way.

After all, I’ve seen it happen many times already.

3 Likes

More than likely those are the shape for the composite blocks. Ofc some dimensions will change. However that is the most logical answer for it. The only thing that can’t be answered is the addition hull and front end armor and their looks.

I have something for you

@Drag0oon
So, being likely is not enough for Gaijin even if in-game model is less likely.
I must admit that it would be very tough since many of the important parameters are hidden in official documents…

@POC_DA_DOC_GOD
Sorry, but I couldn’t read any of the files.

1 Like

It’s just how Gaijin operates. Sometimes it feels like pure luck, depending on which tech mod and eventually which dev sees your bug report. The chances of the devs actually deciding to remake (and buff) the Type 10 are proportional to Gaijin’s statistics on its performance.

Gaijin tends to add things to the game based on their own interpretation, and once something is in, that interpretation becomes the default whether it’s right or not. Even if users present conflicting sources or logical counterpoints, Gaijin won’t budge unless those sources explicitly disprove their claims.

And if no concrete sources exist? Well, whatever Gaijin originally decided becomes the unquestioned truth, no matter how uncertain or unlikely it actually is.

Or, to summarise: We’re simply so good at the game that we don’t need a better tank, even if we’re up against 2A7Vs! Just ignore all the other nation buffs once they started losing! /s

7 Likes

This reminds me of Ho-Ri situation. It seems like they really just picked the version which was best fit for certain BR, even if it was furthest from the planned vehicles. The 1100hp engine is also a very obvious mistake. I don’t know where they got the armor values and weights. Only weights I have seen are 40 and 47,4 tons, but those were for the smaller version.

What could we even try to do with these Ho-Ris? I don’t think they are eager to make completely new 3D models for them.

5 Likes

15 Likes

How about Chi-Nu in… whatever this was.
s-3i-1.jpg.12adff954ee5e497696448bf616a7d9f
s-3i-2.jpg.e3da1c912c55eb7ba3ecf85128d01e66

12 Likes

This would be an amazing skin for the chi nu in game, ngl

1 Like
1 Like

we can get those boddy pillows with that

Yep, activation code is “NationalFoundationDay”

GjgRt0AWkAAwt93

@Grzegames Hey look you can put him in your suggestions now haha

4 Likes

Some people would kill me for this…it’s the perfect plan

7 Likes

And is just for activate the task not for the pillow…