If necessary, I can write suggestions today
I just remembered I actually did report it two years ago, but of course, a reliable source is required, even though this whole turret armor is already created with the developers’ imagination in the first place.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/JlJWu5LEKxuM
New Type 74G/ Kai model by HJM for pre-order.
https://twitter.com/HJ80831183/status/1781136253083066468
10 Likes
Man i wish 🤣
5 Likes
Mitsubishi made 468 bricks for Type 74, just need to know their performance and how they would be installed on the tank 🤔
10 Likes
There’s been confusion over what the Type 4 Ke-Nu actually is. Despite what Wikipedia says, it was not a conversion of the Ha-Go to fit a Chi-Ha turret. It was an unknown turret modification of the Type 2 Ke-To. Interestingly, the below intelligence report also repeats the erroneous information but actually shows what looks to be a Type 5 Ke-Ho
7 Likes
Gaijin always seems to have a problem with strong Japanese lineups. With the Type 81 currently at 11.0, Japan’s lineup at that BR is incredibly competitive. You have three 11.0 MBTs, plus an additional one if you have the premium Type 90. On top of that, you have the Type 81 for AA role. But now, Type 81 will pushing everything to 11.3, meaning you won’t face 10.0 opponents if you have the Type 81 in your lineup. It’s reminiscent of how they ruined the 8.7 and 9.0 lineups.
Friendly reminder this thing doesn’t even get a radar.
Pushing it to 11.7 would make more sense at this point, given the lack of other vehicles at 11.3. Placing it there seems unnecessary, especially since nobody would choose to play it as a standalone vehicle rather than including it in a Type 10 lineup.
9 Likes
Panstir is still MILES better than it; hell, most other SPAAs are also more competitive for their BRs with (usually) better thermals, radar, longer-range missiles that can actually deal with helicopters, and usually have better sights too. I get moving it up from 10.0 to 11.0, but from 11.0 to 11.3, what a way to ruin one of the few amazing lineups Japan had.
8 Likes
With no guns, radar, and requiring a lock-on to fire missiles, it’s hard to justify placing this vehicle just 0.4 BR lower than the TOR-M1 or Pantsir S1.
So now what, get back to the Type 93 and pulling it to 11.0 trying to stay relevant against 12.0 aircraft, as Gaijin seems to consider that more balanced apparently.
10 Likes
Did anyone in feedback even suggest pushing it up or did snail initially leave it out so that nobody would talk about it?
4 Likes
Probably the latter. It’s par for the course on how they shuffle braindead decisions through without any possibility of an uproar causing them to back off on it.
5 Likes
National tressures…
Type 95 bulldozer: A post-war modification, currently on crownfunding for its restoration.
Type 95 Ha-Go: A successfully funded project. Recently arrived to Japan.
Type 95 Kurogane, only two examples exist in Japan, both in excellent conditions.
I really like the looks of this car.
https://twitter.com/kotatsu_neko/status/1781843382832365905
8 Likes
spall liners but what tank is this?
Type 89 I-Go
da heck, then it must be padding???
They say this one is Type 97 Chi-Ha, but I’m not good with Type 89 I-Go turrets.
https://twitter.com/tisyaki/status/1782775123180966361
I’ve heard about asbestos liners somewhere in Japanese tanks and at least Type 95 Ha-Go has it between crew and engine compartments, but why would the whole turret be padded?
Sorry. As real you sent the Chi-Ha turret
I was searching it for Chi-Ha long time and thought that it wasn’t there
So here we have photos of Chi-Ha and I-Go asbestos liners in turret
1 Like
It seems to be from this website, which is indeed a Type 89 turret.
Perhaps they are for sound proofing or maybe protecting the commander’s head from smashing against the wall.