F-16A Blk 10 / F-18A’s
i finished my grind on it, simply because ennemies are not aware of my presence,…
i can deal with BVR (with AIM-7F’s), but once entering WVR (AIM-9L), and even more at merge, you’re a deadmeat still flying.
F-16A Blk 10 / F-18A’s
i finished my grind on it, simply because ennemies are not aware of my presence,…
i can deal with BVR (with AIM-7F’s), but once entering WVR (AIM-9L), and even more at merge, you’re a deadmeat still flying.
Ah yeah don’t need to forget that at previous his claims was many lie like “T-2 can’t use AIM-9L” while de-classified manual clearly state it can
i love his argument to be honest.
i know this is OOT but i like to do the stupid comparison
do we know if the Type 10 can dispense the smoke from the launcher? any video? manual isn’t counted somehow.
because if not then it definitely cannot use it
because “Japan has a thing with playing peacock, and lying.”
I still fondly remember on the Japanese ground thread “The O-I was created as promo material for a tank game”
Funny you mention it,
T-2 never carried AIM-9L’s them
Well we have video and photos of Type 10 launching smokes)
But I understand what you mean of course
I wrote about it just to share this beautiful photo
Of course. Of course
Is this rage bait
so it never carried AIM-9L, huh? (if you’re close to heart attack, do not open the “spoiler” below)


“Oh a CAT-AIM-9L”
(also proof that CAT-AIM-9L exist in JASDF Inventory, about the AAM-3 on F-4EJ Kai)
and i can guess, that it never carried GBU either, huh? (if you’re close to heart attack, do not open the “spoiler” below)
it is, he’s actually angry,… but i don’t know the reasons,…
A little note that it is FS-T2 Kai aka T-2 with full combat systems from F-1 so in fact it is F-1 and not regular T-2
But we anyway has T-2 manual with page stating it can use AIM-9L
And this one is not GBU but GCS
first set of images, congrats you have posted XF-T2 Kai ADTW prototype.
another modified plane that’s unlike the production aircraft.
and the modified T-2A early production variant with High Vis paint GCS-1 mock ups for display use only.
Proving that T-2 can’t use AIM-9L let alone any other ground munition.
“Guided Bomb Unit” just means that it is guided and can move to the target, which is exactly what the GCS are about ^^
If the GCS-1 could even see what it’s looking at.
Still not found evidence that no CAT-AIM-9L were able to be used when they used CAT-AAM-3, on board F-4EJ Kai? guess not, since you’re coming back for intended rage-bait.
Does your quota of the day not filled yet?
Maybe you can explain to us, why manuals say the opposite of yourself, with another great theory of consipration and peacock exposure?
Technically the Type-91/GCS-1 is using IR Tracking device coupled to an INS system (in-game, weapons which INS are given GNSS guidance type) - kinda similar to AASM-250 (SBU-64) “Hammer”, but without any rocket booster.
those have been extensively used in testing and trainning by F-1 (in both M117/Mk.82) then F-2 pilots(Mk.82 only)
so yes, the system is able to “see”
now make your search about CAT-AIM-9L and CAT-AAM-3,…
It can see but fails to track and hit targets. essentially you just have bomb that follows CCIP. congrats.
Another total true statement without proof that IR guidance ammo can’t track any target.
![]()

GCS-1 and 2 would be useless in game,
Can’t track ground targets, at best can only track targets the size of destroyers/frigates.
GCS-2 is GPS only with worse accuracy.