Didn’t japan also try to/consider getting some F-106s? Could look pretty cool.
its the mirage with f-1 camo
1 Like
Hmm… Kawasaki T-4 looks very similar to Alpha Jet.
4 Likes
Too bad we won’t get it anymore because of the subtree :(
Well… same with Fuji T-1.
Kawasaki T-4 has some armament. From what i found in internet.
But there is no pic it being armed besides fuel pods.
3 Likes
Fuji T-1 can still be added to 7.3, Japan has a single vehicle for 7.7(GRB of course) and the whole justification for adding the sub tree was more CAS options, but makes no sense because Japan doesn’t has a 7.7 lineup anymore, but it does has a 7.3 lineup, and the T-1 wouldn’t be out of place at 7.3 considering other jets such as Su-11
7.3 with Aim-9Bs sounds great hehee
Will J/APQ-1 be added? The moderator said there was an internal report in the bug report.
3 Likes
That’s a good point and would definitely be nice to see, even if it’s just rearward facing.
I feel like its armament would be too bad for 7.3 though. Would be better to forego the AIM-9Bs for a possibility of it ending up near the He 162.
I think we can, just compress those bomber tree. I really don’t see the reason why Japan need 2 line of bomber/Cas.
3 Likes
Are these the Kogiken plan figters?
EDIT: isn’t the 2nd one a fighter design of the AICHI M6A, without the floaters and cockpit on Tail instead of center mass?
Interceptor? In real life it is actually a figther
Fighter? In real life it is actually an interceptor
About J7W1 ingame it was long time ago designated as figther.
About Ki-61-I-tei Hien I think its probably a bug.
The only interceptor Ki-61 variant i found is this:
which is not ingame.
4 Likes
The entire classification is just there for gains entertainment.
GB has a tank destroyer the A30 Archer which they reclassified to a medium tank because “it fits the playstyle of one”
Why does it look so weird lol, doesn’t closely look like a J2M
Yeah it looks so weird. And it gets airspawn, i seen one in battle.
