Look Batman Harley Quinn’s an Umamusume now!
Not to get off topic in the lore the trainers mother was a Uma and your father was her trainer. Take that as you will.
Anyway it would be funny if Gaijin had a crossover event. Would be good to test out horse models for infantry mode.
What did the umamusume do in WW1 and 2?
I found this interesting sketch depicting the Mitsubishi J2M with a 30mm and a 20mm cannon.
@Chocolate_Pasta
The J/APG-2 radar, which has inferior detection range, lateral scanning angle, and target display capacity compared to the RBE2 and AN/APG-63(V)3, both developed and upgraded around the same time.
thats cool
That’s interesting, it is totally different with current versions we have, but I really doubt if J2M could able to choose take 20mm cannons or not when it has 30mm cannons, considering most of J2M with 30mm cannons belongs to squad 302. It is even looks like have 4*30mm cannons, with additional gun pods there.
This is my last parting suggestion (there are still 24 pending suggestions).
Unfortunately, I wasn’t able to complete all the suggestions. I hope that one day gajin will change its policy and I’ll be able to write suggestions for, for example, the Nakajima Ki-84 Sa-Go, the Yokosuka P1Y2-S, the Ta-Dan cluster bomb… The list of possible suggestions is still long…
hopefully with the addition of 5th gen aircraft and whatever other modern vehicles there are to add Gaijin might give a little more love to the cold war and WW2 eras
me personally i’d love to see the Ki-201 karyu in the game no matter how it’s implemented
TBF, the J/APG-1 was inferior in many ways like sidelobe suppression and accuracy to radars 2 decades older.
The J/APG-2 is lacking scanning speed and beamforming though. Basically, all AESAs are, but the J/APG-2 in game is slower than its contemporaries when it should be leaning more towards being faster.
J/APG-2 ingame is a complete copy and paste of V004 but with ground and sea modes.
Noooo we will miss you!
Japanese gunpods where a bit of a let down. The USA really knew how to make them.
One thing I’m surprised is they never turned there 2 engine bombers into a heavy fighter or strapped gunpods to them like the USA did.
I’ve seen some recent videos about a Thai F-15EX, but they’re just commentary about whether it will be good or something like that.
The thing is, I haven’t seen any news or anything about Thailand and the F-15EX, except that at some point the US apparently offered it. Does anyone knows if there’s anything else about this?
The Ki-109 was a Ki-67 with a 75mm gun (about 20 aircraft were built), initially used as an interceptor and later as an attack aircraft. A 75mm gun was also tested on the Ki-49. The Japanese planned to install large-caliber guns (possibly even 240mm) on the P1Y.
iirc they offered the EX cause they didn’t wanna sell them the F-35. And so Thailand went with the gripen. mind you this is from a quick Google search so take it with a grain of salt.
Goddess help us a 240mm
Is it just me or does the Ki-49-II Otsu (late) seem like the most pointless plane in the Japanese tech tree? The only difference from the regular Ki-49-II Otsu is a modified engine cowling and it’s slightly faster. I still wonder why it was added to the game. The Ki-49-II Hei or Ki-49-III would have been better, although the appearance of the latter is unknown.
Probably to get the record for “most planes on a simulation game” and to pump up the vehicle numbers with less effort. There are similar aircraft like the Spitfire MK 22 and 24 where they only differ from the 24 having better speed and an extra armament preset.
I personally don’t mind them as long as they are foldered as they are still different variants, even if it’s not by much.
It would be nice if there was at least a difference in armament. Historically, the Ki-49-II Otsu (late model) should have been better defensively armed.
Ki-49-II Otsu (latest) perhaps? /J
Decided to throw another AAM-3 bug report at the wall.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/nqHhKVtfzpZ4
There’s honestly more I could’ve included about how clutter rejection works. Where it works by comparing waveform amplitudes, and about how dual band seekers actually make it able to perform very similar to gatewidth + tracking suspension anyways. As tracking can still be maintained as long as interfearence isn’t to similar to the phase and amplitude. But I didn’t feel like making the report a mile long going over clutter rejection algorithms and all the ways they can work.
