And the 45mm will fire much faster, on a platform that is harder to hit and easier to aim. A side effect to firing faster is that while a Hs 129 or Ki-109 that gets screwed over by gun dispersion might be forced to pull off after one shot to avoid hitting the ground, the 9K can just shoot more with basically no dispersion.
Scores don’t lie, people aren’t going around getting easy 10 kills with XA-38s or Hs 129s.
Yeah because the XP-50 is super rare in Air RB lol
It is actually, because its ONLY disadvantage (post pen damage) is nullified by the fact you can just shoot targets 2 or 3 times while all the ‘big gun’ attackers can only fire once.
And other aircraft with comparable cannons (say, Bf 110 G2 w/ 37mm) have heinous dispersion when firing multiple shots and more importantly, NO APHE. On top of, of course, not being a lightweight, SMALL, agile fighter. Two BR steps for all these upgrades is not enough.
The USSR (and especially their aircraft industry) was unable to produce anything remarkable - the side effect of the special treatments of their smartest engineers/designers.
Within WT you see the exception from the rule, the Yak-3 (introduced September/October 1944) placed in Air RB ridiculously low at 4.0/4.3 whilst contemporary German aircraft (G-14, G-10 and K-4) sit at 5.3 and 2 x 5.7.
The aircraft in question here had a questionable service record and was not easy to use but is modelled to please the average USSR pilot, point & click, no dispersion, high RoF, easy follow up shots.
The exact opposite of my experiences with the 50 mm 262 A-1/U4. The 2 AP rounds suck (hits) when hitting an ai tank or even just a small pillbox whilst precise follow up shots are impossible. The 50 mm HE belt is a joke - i managed to score a direct hit center mass on a landed and stationary BI (yes the ridiculously low rocket fighter at 6.7) and i was rewarded with a hit.
So relax - if you need artificial support to have some success whilst playing the game: Be my guest. Just stop denying presented facts - you simply embarrass yourself and you lose your credibility.
Edit:
I reworked the part regarding the “special treatment” of scientists / engineers as some forum members felt it “offensive” and flagged it. Everybody can google what’s behind this term.I mean that some people feel the need to flag historical facts is typical for this whole thread - denying facts and unable to deal with reality.
I am looking forward for the next “flag attack” - and i am confident that the Forum mods are confirming that this post is within the rules in the ToS.
Germany->Multiple stukas->37mm’s that can do some work if you aim right. 75mm ducks. Several other aircraft are capable of 77 mms of penetration.
Italy is a single aircraft with the largest strapped onto a plane in the game.
Japan has a 75mm meant for bomber hunting to a variable degree of success.
No matter what you state, Russia has only a single Yak-9 with a 45mm. Other nations have more powerful calibers that do work if you know how to aim. At lower Battle Ratings.
It takes a single Google search to dunk this claim you wrote. So its ironic you are telling Uncle J to think before he speaks while failing to do the very same thing.