now you just can launch the missile before mach 1 lol…
It must have been very difficult for Pantsir sv players kill the rafale
11 Likes
It was artificially buffed based on forged documents.
That artificial buff was merely reverted after discovering the documents were forged.
6 Likes
I think we are all tired of the Kh-38MT but it still proves a point although a better example this update would have been the ASM-3 and the KH-38MT/MIG-35.
2 Likes
ASM-3 is only ARH
No my point was that Gajin added these based off little to no evidence, However when dealing with the ASM-3 they denied its seeker the ability to track and attack air targets, because documents available for the missile are from its initial concept designs and early prototypes, which is funnily more sources for it then the KH-38MT has period, and unlike the MIG-35 leaves the door open that they could actually be equipped with the ability unlike the MIG-35 where it is specifically stated that it does not use AESA in its production craft. So the MIG-35 got AESA because the prototypes used it, even though its known the production don’t while the ASM-3 Got denied because the prototypes used this seeker type and there is no proof available the production can. The Kh-38MT was allowed based off a brochure from a phone picture while the ASM-3 Seeker abilities was denied because actual prototype and concept documents are deemed unreliable due to age. See what I’m getting at here?
10 Likes
The problem are not the sources. It’s GJ themselves. They literally listen ONLY when consequences happen.
And they are driven from money as a lone factor. They do not love their game . They do not love aviation or army vehicles or whatever.
Even their Bias is towards specific vehicles and doesn’t care about sources or data or whatever. If they like a vehicle ok. If they don’t get prepared to see your favorite vehicles be trash in game.
It’s just the worst company i’ve ever seen… their modelers however carry the company alone (it seems) .
3 Likes
Even then they don’t usually listen. M735 fix when?
6 Likes
Hey the bug report was accepted about 3 or 4 years ago! Give it time!
2 Likes
is that the infamous “marketing lie”? what exactly is wrong with it right now? genuinely curious
Thats because there is currently no prove that the serial ASM-3 received PRH capability and the A2A mode being an ASM-3 Kai feature at the moment.
1 Like
they dont model dual modes for missiles except GNSS or IOG, so it would be useless anyway if it could do that. like how they denied the PRH for the Kh-35U
In 2023, the devs nerfed it based on a faulty bug report, acknowledged it was faulty, and never changed it back.
It’s been so long that it’s hard to remember but I’m pretty sure it lost like 30mm of flat pen.
2 Likes
@Tsumibito42-psn
Mig-35 has AESA for the same exact reason Typhoon has AESA.
Production models have it as accessible.
And since I don’t see you complaining about Typhoons, your argument is null and void for the reason of double standards & hypocrisy.
1 Like
you try proving a fake missile overperforms when theres no documentation of it… because its fake.
It actually doesnt make me a hypocrit as you don’t need to point out every example of a flaw and handle every what if when making comparison. But the Reason I didn’t mention the eurofighter is because I don’t care enough about some ugly fighter to know the ins and outs of it. And once again my point is still held that they selectively choose something for these vehicles based off potential capability and denied others in the same capacity.
In the same breath you have no ability to prove it didnt carry over that feature from the prototype making it once again a selective addition(or in this case subtraction) by gajin. And besides the KH-38MT still exist in game despite it having no proof it has ever been made past a concept or seen any form of deployment.
"M735 got nerfed off of a single document on the XM735, which is something else entirely. The submitter and the person who looked over the report were both Russian with ESL. Another report was made and accepted that the nerf was inaccurate, but they did not revert the nerf. It has been nearly a year.
The bug reporting forum and the people who look over submitted topics both have a lot of bias in their moderators and employees. Not all of them are, but a decent chunk are."
Or your post’s argument, AKA not you.
As for your post… there’s nothing selective about standardized rules applied to everyone.
Also, Kh-38MT was photographed on a Flanker in Chinese documentation.
Cause it didn’t negatively impact angled penetration, but only flat penetration; I can see Gaijin considering this low-priority when angled pen wasn’t impacted in a negative manner.
Hey
The Hammer was actually just reverted to exactly how it previously was before a bug report that contained falsified sources was used to increase its drop speed.
This was simply a correction to a mistake.