he’s not the one that started talking about nato tanks tho??
why are you SO stubborn about proving that your nation has spall liners HERE? why fucking HERE? huh? don’t you have your own thread? we are trying to talk about chinese spall liners not your bradleys, not your abrams, not your whatevers. beat it or talk about china in the CHINA thread ok?
3 Likes
Meanwhile when I talked about the Chinese vehicles yall still got mad.
1 Like
China Suffers! China Suffers! Nerf Abrams!
2 Likes
/s
what
/s = sarcasm :)
You posted that image multiple times and every single time - it’s quite obvious that there is no spall liner in that interior photo. Your own image makes it clear that there’s no spall liner.
Here’s what a WHOLE LAYER of spall lining looks like on the ZTQ-15.
From this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GP9UFiMA06U
The same thing can be seen in the T-90M interior photos, the same thing can be seen inside YOUR OWN M3A3 Bradley, the same thing can be seen in the CV90s and every other vehicle that has a spall liner. AND SPECIFICALLY IN EVERY CHINESE VEHICLE REPORTED TO HAVE ONE ON THE BUG REPORT.
Your own image you’ve been SPAMMING has nothing but WELDED METAL on the inside of the vehicle.
The spall liner thing has also been disputed multiple times in-thread by people other than me such as @WaretaGarasu. Don’t you get sick of this? You American whiners are everywhere.
4 Likes
that’s literally like 2 posts of him which is always him responding to something someone else started about the abrams. AND he didn’t come here to only talk about the ayybruhms in the [Gaijin REFUSING to add spall liners to CHINESE VEHICLES] thread
2 Likes
Wowzers guys, Bradley too OP! The missiles covered with a spall liner? Practically the same as the CV90s full crew spall liner. China Suffers! Buff ZBD! Buff ZTZ!
1 Like
It’s not OP. It’s an almost useless spall liner.
But THAT’S what it looks like in interior photos. And THAT got added. Because THAT is an actual visible spall liner.
The visible spall liners on Chinese tanks DIDN’T get added.
4 Likes
Fortunately ZBD doesn’t get Tandem missile
it always has to be about YOU american players doesnt it
4 Likes
they already have them
1 Like
For the 11.7s they definitely should, they’d be a slightly worse T-90M.
But any MBT below 11.3 doesn’t deserve them
They changed it to the tandem one?
The mere fact you keep typing this is proof you don’t read, nor do you know about the design of the Abrams. the Kevlar is built into the Armor array, so when or if the armor is penetrated, the only thing that will happen is a small hole and a minimum conde of debris. You could fire a 9M123 AT THE SIDE of an abrams and the only thing you are going to get is a fist sized hole going into the tank, this is simple knowledge and understanding of engineering. Something your nation and most certainly RUSSIA have known about, yet chose to continue to put spall liners inside the crew compartments so the cone of spall is wider than it should be. Do u all a favor, learn how U.S Combat vehicles are engineered, before you make any more low i.q statements.
since yesterday, but it wasnt on the changelog
1 Like
That is stupid. In that case, delete the full spall liner coverage for the multiple Swedish 9040Cs.
And delete the spall liner on the M3A3 Bradley. Since apparently, to you, spall liners are somehow related to BR? And not whether the vehicle actually had them or not?
Well akshually america isnt good and abrams is bad, glorious china vehicle can one shot abrams in turret!
1 Like
Just watch it and you get your answer
1 Like