This guy… AGAIN. I don’t know whether to feel sorry for you or just laugh.
I’ve asked you to show me the relevant sources twice now.
If you’re unable to show evidence which supports your position, I’ll simply qoute: ‘‘That which is asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence’’.
This isn’t about armor, but if you want to help the U.S tech tree Abrams’ firepower, support this bug report!
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Elbjvv2tjRYq
KEW-A2 for M1A1 AIM, its historical shell and analogue to M829A2.
Minor correction, AIM uses KE-W which is a Tungsten variant of the M829A1, KE-W A1 is an export version of the German DM43(A1).
:p
M829A3 wouldn’t be added because every Russian tank that’s not T80BVM,T90M,T72B3 would be F.
I’d rather them not do that and keep it at 11.3 where it can capitalize on down tiers bette
On second thought I don’t really care if its 11.3 or 11.7 if it gets the dart
So they should add m829a4? That way everyone is F
/s
M1A1 AIM is far better than M1A2-SEP-SEPV2 somehow, i’ve played them all and its really better.
So it gets to 11.7 wouldn’t matter.
No? M829A3 is enough at this moment, they should’ve added it with SEPV2 with TROPHY but Nuh Uh.
Really? What does the aim have over the SEP/SEPv2?
Also I was make joke about m829a4
Anything that’s M1A1 is better, the turret ring is thicker than any other A2.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Warthunder/comments/1e5wr2f/why_did_the_first_m1_have_better_turret_ring_than/
Interesting, didn’t know that.
Not really, M1A1s and M1A2s have the same ring;
Only M1 and IPM1’s are different (and different among themselves too lmao)
IPM1’s ring is possibly the best.
Oh, I thought KE-W was KE-W A1, being the export M829A1, the same way KE-W A2 was the export M829A2!
Didn’t know any of them had any relation to DM43
The base M1 is 50mm thicker than M1A2, any other thing you said i totally agree, IPM1 is the best one.
For future reference;
KE-W → M829A1
KE-W A1 → DM43(A1)
KE-W A2 → M829A2
KE-W A3 → M829A2 with DM63s propellant
KE-T → M829A3
KE-W A4 → DM63A1
Noted, thanks!
kew A2/A4 and AIM moved to 11.7 could be pretty fire
KE-W A1 also being similar to OFL 120 F1 of the Leclerc (same penetrator, as it was extracted from the joint Franco-german project for the DM43/OFL 120 F1)
I highly doubt Gaijin would implement a top-BR squadron/premium tank.
Maybe they would consider it if the top BR were raised to 12.0 - 12.3 in a year or so.
My man israel regularly encounters spike copied. Those missiles are significantly better than even most stuff in ukraine