Not really, M1A1s and M1A2s have the same ring;
Only M1 and IPM1’s are different (and different among themselves too lmao)
IPM1’s ring is possibly the best.
Oh, I thought KE-W was KE-W A1, being the export M829A1, the same way KE-W A2 was the export M829A2!
Didn’t know any of them had any relation to DM43
The base M1 is 50mm thicker than M1A2, any other thing you said i totally agree, IPM1 is the best one.
For future reference;
KE-W → M829A1
KE-W A1 → DM43(A1)
KE-W A2 → M829A2
KE-W A3 → M829A2 with DM63s propellant
KE-T → M829A3
KE-W A4 → DM63A1
4 Likes
Noted, thanks!
kew A2/A4 and AIM moved to 11.7 could be pretty fire
KE-W A1 also being similar to OFL 120 F1 of the Leclerc (same penetrator, as it was extracted from the joint Franco-german project for the DM43/OFL 120 F1)
I highly doubt Gaijin would implement a top-BR squadron/premium tank.
Maybe they would consider it if the top BR were raised to 12.0 - 12.3 in a year or so.
My man israel regularly encounters spike copied. Those missiles are significantly better than even most stuff in ukraine