G.91 YS to 9.3 - G.91 Y to 9.0. Why are you taking years to fix this? MiG19/F104/MiG21 are 9.3 but the YS is still 9.7?

Machinery of War Discussion Aircraft
1

Why do you hate Italy?

14 Likes
2

I agree, 9.7 is way too high of a br for a plane with no countermeasures and horrible missiles

11 Likes
3

Same could be said for the J29F & A32A and possibly the J32B they are both planes with horrible speed at their br and the missiles are just as horrible. They are also missing Flares or chaff

1 Like
4

J32B has been lowered to 9.3 already, and is faster and has more missiles than the G91YS. Buy yes, J29F was upped to 9.0 but it is too hard to play with, especially the high repair cost.

2 Likes
5

The J32B actually suffers from the same problems that the J29F does. Yes it is Faster and has a MUCH stronger engine but if it meets a MiG 19, MiG 21, F104. etc. Or any other plane that either has a Better Engine or manoeuvrability or god forbid Both. It will loose.

The J32B was a interceptor not a Fighter but as you don’t have IL 28s flying around. But Even if there is they are AI’s That doesn’t give any real amount of SL or RP. So its forced into Fighting Fighters.

The J29F was meant to deal with MiG 19s and MiG 15s. not the J32B.

And the A32A was a attacker honestly I think the A32A could be at the current 8.7 and be fine as there isn’t any(many) Supersonics The A32A cant go supersonic and the engine is average at best.

So I think br 7.0 - br 12.0 should look like this.

separate Aircraft into different Tiers & categories
This way everyone has a Fair advantage and Futureproofs the addition of new Jets. This means there will still be better aircraft but it wont be as Bad as it is currently. And by locking the Br’s you prevent Down tiers of (Example) F104 that can just zoom around and wreck everyone because that’s just a thing. And god forbid up tiers That’s sign saying Free SL here!

  1. No Missiles, No Countermeasures, Not Transonic, Can have Radar, No afterburner.
    battle rating Lock - 7.0 - 7.7 - battle rating Lock

  2. Has IR missiles, No Countermeasures, Not Transonic, Can have Radar, Can reach 800 - 900 km/h
    battle rating Lock - 8.0 - 8.7 - battle rating Lock

  3. Has IR Missiles, No Countermeasures, Transonic, Can have Radar, can reach 1000 km/h
    battle rating Lock - 9.0 - 9.7 - battle rating Lock

  4. Has IR missiles, Has Countermeasures, Is Supersonic, Can have Radar.
    can reach Mach 1, Ok power to weight ratio.
    battle rating Lock - 10.0 - 10.7 - battle rating Lock

  5. Has All-aspect & IR Missiles, Has Countermeasures, Has radar/IRST.
    can reach Mach 1/2, Ok power to weight ratio.
    battle rating Lock - 11.0 - 11.7 - battle rating Lock

  6. Has Radar / IR / All-aspect missiles, Has Countermeasures, Has Radar/IRST,
    can reach Mach 1/2, good Power to weight Ratio.
    battle rating Lock - 11.0 - 11.7 - battle rating Lock

  7. Has Radar / IR / All-aspect missiles, Has Countermeasures, Has Radar/IRST,
    can reach Mach 1/2, Incredible Power to weight Ratio.
    battle rating Lock - 12.0 - 12.7 - battle rating Lock

Now this can Bend Slightly to fit planes into the Br’s. But I suspect that this will be a Huge improvement IF The Economic Situation is improved. This will also prevent players from bringing Low tier planes into Top tier that just gets annoying…

3 Likes
6

You are right we had already asked in the previous forum, to lower the BR, but as always we were ignored, I guess the developers enjoy nerfing all vehicles that are not Russian to make propaganda.

This is how the BR of Italian aircraft in Rank V and IV should be.

In my opinion they need to do another Review Bombed to force them to correct their mistakes.

8 Likes