I have decided to buy it anyway, to support the fellow players, who don’t deserve to be punished for a balance error. I doubt I’ll play it for a while, however. I’ll wait either for a change in BR or simply for me to be a more experienced pilot before I give it a go.
2 Likes
When I turn off the Instructor and use MEC, the aircraft experiences a strong sideslip to the left. Takeoff has become extremely difficult due to the flight model. Is this a bug?
You might consider keeping the main slide for the instructor “on” but disable the 5 or 6 individual slides for the instructor by putting them to “off”.
This ensures that the engine torque effects and the need for trimming the aircraft vanishes whilst you still can use the advantages of having no AoA limitations and even better handling.
Using MEC or disabling the individual Instructor slides does not require to use FR controls - i fly exclusively with SFC (Simplified Flight Controls) in Air RB…
1 Like
Thanks. That’s really helpful
But… it’s about Sim
The great discovery that the Fw 189C is well suited for sightseeing flights.
Nope. Still remains the same:
Gaijin, what was the point of going through the trouble of adding the SC 10, SD 50, SD 70, etc…into this game if you people then refuse to add these to the payloads of applicable aircraft that used them, including both 189? Is the intention just to clutter up people’s hard drives with unusable assets (bloat)? Alternatively, you are selling an incomplete product that is missing a variety of bomb equipment. Once again, in case you did not see this:
Also, if you are selling the ‘ground attack variant’, then it needs its primary ground attack ordnance, the SD 2, mounted in either the AB 23/AB 24 container or on the standard ETC 50 bombrack…
8 Likes
Oh, thats a nice comparisson, i will now call it Gans, just as i always call the Hs 129 Ente. (I dont really care that the Fw 189 wasnt called Gans historically, since it didnt even go in production in the C variant.)
3 Likes
After playing it a while now. Its nice, relatively nimble. But i think 2.7 for ground is way too high, It just got 50kg bombs on the outside wings. Just 2x 15mm against ground (which can work, but do rather low damage). And should in Ground RB be at 2.0 Max.
2.7 is crazy, there are so many other planes, with stronger armarment, bombs and speed. Bf 110. C-3604 Me 210 and more. Even some Bipanes are faster than this.
5 Likes
If they really worried about that they wouldn’t be trying to drop an infantry mode
they did not look at your bug report 
i personal have to play with my hair like this girl do to remove my stress when bug report don’t get seen after long time of research.
it’s not nice to ignore players it’s very mean thing to do players have feelings 😭😭💔
wow 🙀🙀they still ignore them !??? 😾
Bf 109z / He 177 SC 2500 bombs / Fw 189 and other old bug reports by players it’s big bug report list ( the Do 335 B-2 model is wrong it’s copy past from Do 335 A model.
mr snail developer don’t answer question at all for WWII bug reports and i tagged community mangers to get answer but always get ignored most of the time and i keep posting same bugs over and over and complain about this issue for months / years and no answers at all.
why they don’t get fixed after 3 years to 2 years?
why new bug report get fixed fast but old ones from years still not fixed?
all players who like WWII and make bug report to make experience better and add planes / tanks missing armaments.
if mr snail did not remove the delete forum account option i would deleted my forum account long time ago i thought mr snail forum it’s where snails talk with developers to help improve / bug report the video game but nien.
1 Like
Mr Snail couldnt care less.
I think you’ve used so much 🧂 that Snail has grown immunity to it
2 Likes
Gaijin for some reason just loves only giving German bombers 50 kg bombs. I mean look at my boy BV 138!!! They’ve butchered him! Still managed to kill a destroyer tho.
StuG III G. Also, is it the Stummel, Hummel or both?
Really? When did this happen? If this is the case, it was their own fault for modeling an unpopular enlisted ripoff & boring post-war gameplay instead of what most people were anticipating: WW2 infantry done correctly. If infantry is indeed completely dropped from this game, then they should use the free time gained to start fixing all the bugs & problems that still plague this game
If anyone is interested in correcting the BV 138, the Bundesarchiv has recently digitized many relevant manuals such as the following:
https://invenio.bundesarchiv.de/invenio/direktlink/a0a6a6eb-ab11-441d-8d34-c83b83415aad/
https://invenio.bundesarchiv.de/invenio/direktlink/2ac4cbf2-bedd-47de-9d20-ec78be341bde/
https://invenio.bundesarchiv.de/invenio/direktlink/7b165856-7be9-4da1-8c33-b8d811be8d40/
Some excerpts:
3 Likes
The third CBT for infantry just ended. It is not an Enlisted-like system. Instead it’s more like Battlefield lite.
BRs will apparently cover from the Korean War to modern day. In practice Korea means WW2 weapons will be present.
I’m specifically talking about the Stummel, because in Enlisted (A Gaijin owned game) it had an MG, but not in WT.
1 Like
On-again, off-again thing or was the guy’s claim that they dropped development mistaken?
Ugh. So it is a worse HDD space eating irrelevancy then. I severely doubt that ANY of the important/interesting weapons will even show up at all: MG 34, Solothurn S-18/1000, Flammenwerfer 41, 8 & 12 cm Granatwerfer 42, FG 42, MG 42, Gewehr 43, Panzerfaust/Schreck, StG 44…all in Korea??? So what was the point of this little project of yours, gaijin?
Ah ok. I suppose that the question is: Why did they delete the MG & its mount to begin with? To save some insignificant megabytes? Leave our historical MGs alone & instead go prune some of the fake vehicles roaming the soviet side…I love how a correction to their errored model is passed off as a mere ‘suggestion’:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/jk2vu4T5RRs2
2 Likes
Sorry mate, I think this is a linguistic misunderstanding. The guy didn’t mean “drop” as in “abandon” but in the antithetical sense of “dropping content” (i.e. releasing content). I think another CBT or two, and then infantry will go into open beta.
A few of these will show up for sure.
Imho they are just trying not to have a full overlap with Enlisted.
I just realized I’m gonna have to give my game a huge update that’ll take up tons of space for something I will never play, because I don’t leave the WW2 era! Such a waste!