you know I didnt even notice the MCO addon has more ufp armour lol
Even this states that the MCO and PSO packages are different fitments, implying there is an “unfitted” version which would, in and of itself, be another armour layout; so I refer to my previous statement, that there are 3 armour packages/layouts for Ajax. Basic, MCO and PSO.
Basic is thin sheet side skirts
MCO is either composite or ERA side skirts, by reading that document it’s implied it would be ERA of some form.
PSO is cage armour on top of the MCO package. again, by reading the document, it says that it protects against small arms and RPG’s, implying the existence of RPG cage.
Edit: overall its just incredibly hard to tell with limited information. But if there is only two, and MCO is for some reason the unarmoured side one, that means theres 2 versions of the PSO kit. one with and one without cage.
Like maybe like the TES that’s a modular addon kit maybe?
Spoiler
in theory, kinda. Warrior had a few armor packages like that, such as TES, TES(H) and WRAP2, aswell as its composite skirts.
Ajax will have two, or debatable three armour configs. Side skirts which look like they are just metal plates, MCO (or PSO) and then PSO (or PSO with cage)
(its a bit early for me and my brain is getting confused now.)
I sincerely, even though I know it wouldn’t be a huge improvement, would love to see both the Scimitar Mk2 and the Warrior TES added to the game, since with those railings and paraphernalia mounted on the vehicle, it looks very aesthetically pleasing to me.
I would also appreciate it if they changed the model of the FV 102 Stryker, since the 3D model in the game did not have a thermal sight, whereas the Gulf War model did.
2 Likes
Im waiting for the day the tow2bs are worth a damn
For at duty undoubtedly better. The spike is a much mote versatile missile irl but its incredibly poorly nodelled in wt
Warrior TES, TES(H) and WRAP2 and Scimitar 2 TES are some of my most desired vehicles to be added to the game. I hope they add them. with my armour drop down menu suggestion, it would make it more viable and easy without bloating tech trees, but we NEED them.
But first they need to fix the warrior’s model. Give it back its front left towing eye (it used to have it but they removed it.) and the right side FPE cover…
1 Like
I think we’re never getting usefull armor packages on western afva ever at this point
Is there potential to add the 30mm Rarden APFSDS that (i’m sure i’ve heard) was cleared for use to make them more unique from the other variants?
Like VFM5))))
with almost 30hp/t its accelerates soooo slowly. Even vickers mk.11 with just 17.5hp/t accelerates much faster.))))))))
1 Like
I make bug-report in rus
“desert warrior can be without additional armor”
But still silence.
Maybe someone should take pictures from my bug-report and make bug-report in english
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/MZjXk68OP7La
oops sorry yes it is major, my mistake
No, ajax only has two fitments, MCO and PSO, MCO is the standard fit, i have yet to see anything state otherwise. Also note that photo is from a longgg time ago, well before drop 3 and 4 we have now.
you dont know what is behind the tracks.
What is the weight of the standard Ajax we see currently?
I’ve seen figures from 32-42 tons
Well, I really don’t know. As you say, it seems that the adoption of an APDS-FS for the L21A1 has been approved, but for the moment it has not been seen. The only thing that is known is that in principle it is an APDS-FS originally from a 30x173 caliber Rheinmetall cannon (possibly the PUMA cannon), to which the 30x170 L21A1 cartridge case has been added. This would mean that it would have a penetration somewhat lower than that of the German Puma.