Further additions of the Z-10

easier to just let it go up when take off, down when landed, no need for a key bind.

1 Like

awe, but I wanna do the thing

strv122b piko

This is the worst excuse I have ever seen. I don’t believe gaijin won’t nerf CM502

1 Like

Even QN506 has that mechanism
Anyway, they are just too lazy to add another key for that.

should be just new generation laser seeker, same structure are seen in laser guided bombs
image

Yes, that is, it is possible to give spikes for infantry fighting vehicles with a range of 20 kilometers that do not go to countermeasures, but it is impossible to give the helicopter the same IR missiles (JUST PICK UP the LOAL). Logic

A Helicopter with a 20km F&F is much, much more dangerous than an IFV with 20km F&F’s.

The biggest ground maps are like, what, 4x4km?. Range for ground launch F&F’s stops mattering beyond a certain point because the ground map itself is so small. A 20km Spike has no noticeable advantage over a 10km Spike when the enemy tank is only 4km away, right?

Whereas you put that 20km missile on a Helicopter, and not only is it actually capable of taking full advantage of that range, but it’s also much more dangerous in using it because unlike an IFV, the helicopters LOS is not as easily obstructed by buildings and topography.

Something being present on a ground vehicle doesn’t automatically make it balanced to give to an air vehicle.

The point is not that it is dangerous for tanks, but that it is an ultimate means of destroying helicopters, without adequate counteraction (only hide behind a mountain or DIRCM). . 20 kilometers by helicopter, with a warhead (NOT CUMULATIVE. HIGH EXPLOSIVE) , 11KG with low speed, this is a very controversial weapon. The flight speed will not allow you to realize 20 km. And the air defense systems are now firing at 40 kilometers. They can simply not give LOAL.

By “systems” you refer to the Singular SLM, which can’t hit helicopters with IRCM anyway.

None of these new AA’s are particularly good at countering Heli’s. Pantsir & HQ17 will remain the best for that.

So let them do their direct task - intercept the missiles.

All the new AA’s are pretty awful at doing that on dev server too.

None of them come close to the interceptive capabilities of the old SACLOS systems (and we all know those were already being overwhelmed).

This is a problem with their configuration. In my opinion, even the CS/SA 5 does not have SARH guidance, which should be IR+SARH. I think CS/SA 5 useless, we need HQ-11 or HQ-16.

No, we need the LY-70 it has both 38KM ARH missiles and re-branded FB-10A missiles called LY-70IR (it’s the same missile)
70-system
70
China_unveils_new_LY-70_mobile_short_medium-range_air_defense_missile_system_925_002
8ARH and 6 FB-10A

BVVB say USSR can take Buk M3 (ARH, 80KM). We need Hq-16B. (Sad, because SARH)

I don’t think these long range systems will be playable, most likely Airfrield protection

The SLM can already hit all corners of the map adding a 70km system is silly unless they rework ground RB completely

IDK. But i know, that gaijin will find a way to make Chinese technology weak

To be honest, when Gaijin forgot add HMD for TY90, it is time to know that there is no hope for any Chinese-owned helis to get buff, Z10ME is totally worse than MI28NM or KA52 but still at the same BR, seems like a bias or PTSD for Chinese Helis

I really hope that he gets at least a full-fledged cockpit and cockpit, and not just a plug. Otherwise, I’ll get really upset. And it is advisable to give him HMD anyway.

That is how it is on dev, in real server this could change. Also regarding FnF, this doesn’t have to be one, SAL is available due to modular design, and even for FnF there is still the TV, which won’t go past 8km for any of the existing systems. Sure, that will still be really strong on a heli, but that will not mean it in anyway gets OP.


This was a welcome surprise but I still doubt it’ll ever get added…

1 Like