So let them do their direct task - intercept the missiles.
All the new AA’s are pretty awful at doing that on dev server too.
None of them come close to the interceptive capabilities of the old SACLOS systems (and we all know those were already being overwhelmed).
This is a problem with their configuration. In my opinion, even the CS/SA 5 does not have SARH guidance, which should be IR+SARH. I think CS/SA 5 useless, we need HQ-11 or HQ-16.
No, we need the LY-70 it has both 38KM ARH missiles and re-branded FB-10A missiles called LY-70IR (it’s the same missile)
8ARH and 6 FB-10A
BVVB say USSR can take Buk M3 (ARH, 80KM). We need Hq-16B. (Sad, because SARH)
I don’t think these long range systems will be playable, most likely Airfrield protection
The SLM can already hit all corners of the map adding a 70km system is silly unless they rework ground RB completely
IDK. But i know, that gaijin will find a way to make Chinese technology weak
To be honest, when Gaijin forgot add HMD for TY90, it is time to know that there is no hope for any Chinese-owned helis to get buff, Z10ME is totally worse than MI28NM or KA52 but still at the same BR, seems like a bias or PTSD for Chinese Helis
I really hope that he gets at least a full-fledged cockpit and cockpit, and not just a plug. Otherwise, I’ll get really upset. And it is advisable to give him HMD anyway.
That is how it is on dev, in real server this could change. Also regarding FnF, this doesn’t have to be one, SAL is available due to modular design, and even for FnF there is still the TV, which won’t go past 8km for any of the existing systems. Sure, that will still be really strong on a heli, but that will not mean it in anyway gets OP.
Almost forgot this when listing possible choices, though not sure IR version is exhibited.
considering it’s 18km range is used by drones in high altitude and clearly a faster start speed, could be a choice.
The 2016 Zuhai expo sign mentions it can use a IR seeker
Bit hard to read but you can make it out
“Adaptable to the infrared imaging seeker”
can also see 可拓_ _外成像, has to be infra red seeker
I saw it, I mean, the problem is , we don’t know what it looks likes, so it will be a problem for the modelers
same problem occurs in many Chinese loadouts like the Chinese GBU-53 and many other AGMs/bombs
here is the full original image
I’m sure it’s a trivial task to model a IR seeker for the missile.
even if it’s not 1:1 as long as it’s believable it should be fine
Iirc one of the AG-300 missiles is floating around in the files but i could also be thinking of something else
What I would give just to see half of those missiles implemented…