i don’t like graphs, i prefer raw gameplay to determine if a plane is good or not, and skill issue cuz its very good for 5.7 and Spitfires are rare to see ingame, mostly there’s a lot P-51s and Yaks

Is this guy serious? does he know?
This is nonsense, without actual information you wouldn’t know the difference, because you only played the 109K-4 three times!
He’s only played the plane 3 times
Massive skill issue if you don’t understand graphs lol
By which we get pretty much the same thing graphs can give us, except for rudder limits and instructor trimmings, yet that’s far beyond your skill level
Proof of skill issue
Do I have to comment on 51H, or do I laugh cuz d30 is 5.0?
We are on the hook mate It’s a trap
German 30mm has low range and ridiculously low velocity.
US 20mm let you shred people from 1100m away. Hitting with German guns past 500m gets rather difficult, most of my kills are actually at lower range.
P/W doesn’t really mean much if the G suit and higher AOA and low speed lift will carry the the plane
im not a nerd that wants to know every single thing of its plane, i just play for fun and call a plane good or bad if i like it and im good with it (also if a YTber gives its personal opinion about the plane, since YTbers are mostly skilled and know what they’re saying)

so not seeing an OP plane is skill issue? almost nobody plays Great Britain and the ones who play them usually use Wyvern or any other decent Spitfire, but at least when i play, i rarely see one since they probably die first against others of my mates
u can’t be serious u’re going to questionate multiple YTbers like MiGanfox-3 or DEFYN about their opinion of vehicles
You really trust their opinions like the gospel 💀
so not seeing an OP plane is skill issue? almost nobody plays Great Britain and the ones who play them usually use Wyvern or any other decent Spitfire, but at least when i play, i rarely see one since they probably die first against others of my mates
The only situation were the bf is OP is the 109F-4 in an average Air Arcade match
im not a nerd that wants to know every single thing of its plane, i just play for fun and call a plane good or bad if i like it and im good with it
Then why should anyone listen, if you reject any evidence that obviously points in the opposite direction, and if you’re incapable of understanding why a plane is good or not?
i cant say anything about miganfox however they have never done any videos on props, they have only ever done top tier jet content, so they cant be used as evidence.
as for defyn he has done a video on the k4, from 3 years ago, and even he says the thing is outclassed at 5.7, and this is when it could carry the gun pods and still climb meaning its only gotten worse.
its funny youre trying to defend yourself by using youtubers when said youtubers disprove your very own points.
You really trust their opinions like the gospel 💀
Well, they’re more skilled than u and me so they’re a very good info source to know how to decently use a vehicle in particular.
Also not many YTbers do content about props since they’re boring and mostly a “get certain plane to win” than a “BR that requires skill”.
Toptier is more chaotic, interesting and difficult and that’s why normally all the youtubers do content about it, since it’s harder to dodge a missile than a bullet.
its funny youre trying to defend yourself by using youtubers when said youtubers disprove your very own points.
I’m not defending the K-4, i’m just saying it’s a good plane due to the maneuverability, thrust and insane armament it can carry (2x20mm cannons + 2x13mm MG + 30mm pneumatic cannon), not that it’s the most OP fighter in Game, but it was called the best WW2 fighter irl
Then why should anyone listen, if you reject any evidence that obviously points in the opposite direction, and if you’re incapable of understanding why a plane is good or not?
I think it’s better to play with the plane and determinating how u should play with it (or watch a video of someone who already tested it) than relying on graphs that even if they give u important information about ur plane’s performance, it’s almost useless in a dogfight that will end in less than a minute (almost).
I didn’t play with the K-4 for too long cuz i own the premium Tornado, and i prefer to play with a fast attacker that farms SL and RP by itself than playing with a WW2 fighter i don’t like cuz i want EF-2000 and all the planes at all ranks aren’t my type when i own a better and also premium option.
If u have a different opinion about how i know if a vehicle is good or not, at least be respectful
i’m just saying it’s a good plane due to the maneuverability
This is a lie
insane armament
This is also a lie
not that it’s the most OP fighter in Game
It’s literally average
I think it’s better to play with the plane and determinating how u should play with it (or watch a video of someone who already tested it) than relying on graphs that even if they give u important information about ur plane’s performance, it’s almost useless in a dogfight that will end in less than a minute (almost).
You say that like I’ve haven’t played Air RB for 900 hrs and mostly props, I know how most of the major planes play, using graphs to depict a planes performance is literally a representation of how the plane performs with real numbers vs your intuition of bombing bases with rank 7 premiums.
You say that like I’ve haven’t played Air RB for 900 hrs and mostly props, I know how most of the major planes play, using graphs to depict a planes performance is literally a representation of how the plane performs with real numbers vs your intuition of bombing bases with rank 7 premiums.
I wanna keep u in mind i said almost, almost useless, not entirely useless since i also use graphs sometimes, specially for missiles, but whatever i don’t like graphs i need to do a lot of things to get the resulta vs. Inviting a friend to a custom and test it by ourselves.
For example: notching, launching missiles at different distances/angles, which plane has more thrust at in different situations and environments, etc