Are you talking about a K/D of 10 - 1 against air targets with scout drones excluded? 13 - 1 with scout drones.
Last time I checked Your overall K/D in LAV-AD is 3.88 after 31 battles in RB.
If You have any way to prove how many times You have died to planes/tanks, I would love to see it!
1 Like
I just did. The singular death in those four matches was infact to a plane.
Warthunder sadly doesn’t record plane and tank deaths differently, which allows people like you to lie abt stats. That is why post battle summaries are so helpful.
4 games? That is not really a big portion of data, I could play 4 games where I destroy LAV-ADs and say that they can’t do anything.
Please tell me where have I lied about stats.
Then exactly how many games should I play before it satisfies your demands?
4 is plenty, especially when I had a 7.0 K/D v.s air in the first 25 games (mind you most were played with Fim-92E). If you’re bad at using LAV-AD and don’t believe someone can get a good K/D in it, you can just say it.
Well for starters, claiming that tank deaths correlate to air K/D.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
2 Likes
There is nothing like “my” demand, it is simply what an SPAA unit can do at that B.R. vs air units it faces. When it comes to that, air untis can do much more.
4 games is nothing espeically given 1825 games:
https://thunderskill.com/en/vehicle/us_lav_ad
Do You have any screanshoots or server replay to back up what You claim about this 25 games?
You might not be familiar with term “overall”
What I said is:
because:
Ok, so, you do realize that the vast majority of those 1825 are people using it for AT and ratting, right?
4 games of SPAA is far more indicative of SPAA performance than 1825 games of light tank.
If you know that info in inaccurate then don’t willingly cite that inaccurate info.
The issue is:
so we can’t really say that.
There is nothing inaccurate about it as this are You overall stats in that vehicle. Again:
For the love of god you two are in the same debate from months ago. And you are even using the same arguments.
2 Likes
I open and close these threads lol
Dude, something that incorrectly records information, or leaves information out is by definition inaccurate.
Yup, apparently 10.0 K/D means a vehicle is actually bad if it’s an SPAA.
Game stats are accurate and show Your overall stats in this vehicle, there is nothing incorrect about citing them.
And apparently now we can just make claims and everyone should belive them ;)
They leave out information. It’s as simply as that.
Well if you can’t trust Warthunder’s actual post game summary, then idk what you can trust in regards to stats.
yeah and clearly in the video he should have given its missiles better launch parameters by launching at 6 km alt and around mach 1…
and talking about spaa…which ones are you refering to in top/high tier? and which cas planes? Genuinely wondering since
and
SPAA is far stronger than CAS, especially when SAMs come into play.
Are quite interesting statements considering it is literally impossible to shoot down a heli rusher in a buk as soon as hes 3 km or closer to you or staying low. As its similarly very unlikely to shoot down any of the top tier cas planes if the pilot somehow knows what hes doing and doesnt pop up too far from you or gets too greedy. Sure you might be able to shoot his agms down, if youre really lucky u might even get all of them (unlikely) but that wont stop him from just going rtb and rearm, something you cant do in spaa and on most maps youre basically bound to sit around in spawn because anywhere else gets you killed from across half the map by a tank.
No they dont. They just clump it all together. All the data is in there it is just not separated by type. If it left out air kills and did not record them then it would be leaving out info.
They don’t leave out any infromation as they record every battle.
4 screanshoots proving that in 4 games You were able to kill 13 air units and 3 of them were bots/drones?
Leaving out the distinction is leaving out info. Why is this even up for debate?
Is that not enough games/kills? If not, how many do I need?
No one left anything as “overall” meaning didn’t change.
As I have said:
you have said
If 4 games really isn’t enough, and those 4 games don’t prove that SPAA is plenty powerful, then how many do I need?
If you cite overall stats in a discussion about specific stats then that is citing a source that leaves out the necessary information for the discussion.