All this hazze. Its pretty much obvious that you can’t put up these high pen and very mobile autocannon recon vehicles vs. WW2 and early cold war stuff.
Up its BR ffs. How hard is it? Let is fight vs. BMDs and BMP-2 etc. etc. Whats the point of releasing hell vs. Tigers etc? Whose idea was it in the first place this would be even remotely fair?
You’ve made yourself look ignorant and clinically inept this entire thread. We’ve all had a good time laughing at you and your sheer stupidity and skill issue.
If that happens, I might actually fork out for a T-55AM-1 and embrace the bias because there is no way in hell that matchup is fair. All you have is the element of surprise, and pray for them to be deaf
I can’t say because I don’t own any bushes. And the old guard of the game protests that bushes should not be hideable via the in game options because they don’t provide an advantage, and its a “skill issue” if you cannot see a bush user.
That’s rather interesting considering the side armor of the M26 Pershing (as well as the T26E1), M47, and M48 is not angled, and nor is the side armor of the T34 heavy tank of which I have used to fight against the Fox extensively.
I’ll also have you know that I’ve played both German and Swedish tanks around the BR range of the Fox, and have never had a struggle destroying them, even with the Centurions. It’s called keeping your eyes and ears open, maybe you should try it some time.
The Fox is not a difficult vehicle to deal with. I’m not even a British main, nor have I played the Fox, and I still find your argument for raising it’s BR ridiculous. You do understand that if you put the Fox at 8.0, it’ll only do even better considering the armor it faces it much thinner compared to the WWII heavy tanks it can fight, right?
It’s an aptly named vehicle, it’s nimble and fast, but much like the animal it is named after, you must be cunning to do well in it. Artificially nerfing a vehicle’s performance because you’re incapable of countering it is the real “skill issue” here.
There are many things, but it’s “17pdr” if you’re gonna use an abbreviated version of “Ordnance Quick Firing, 17-pounder”
My good sir, you cannot possibly say that in good faith given you were advocating for R-77s to be put on a 12.0 Su-25/Su-39. Which I can positively say is insane.
Well seeing as thus far they’ve refused to elaborate on what “parameters” they’ve changed… which bothers me. Ahistorical nerfs for “balancing” are one thing, trying to dress it up as some historical change is quite another.
This unspecified recalculation is living rent free in my head. Seeing how the Fox isn’t being moved, leaves me with a sense of dread that because it isn’t being moved, they are nerfing (Recalculating) RARDEN and lowering its pen.
Maybe they are touching up on the penetration falloff or what ever was shown to be abnormal earlier in this thread or just flat out nerfing RARDEN because of the Fox, which will immediately make the Warrior 15x worse.
Not just Warrior 15x worse, pretty much anything with the RARDEN, Scimitar, Sabre, FV 432 RARDEN, prototypes, if gaijin allow it 1 day, the Saladin (R) which is basically a design of a saladin with RARDEN Fox turret.
Suddenly the mainstay and effectively, only service autocannon the UK uses through the cold war into modern era is slapped, unless gaijin decide to give an a-historic 2000s APFSDS prototype round for which next to nothing is public information.