“Still have yet to find out why the MILAN keeps saying it has lost contact with the launcher when firing above anything that covers the RARDEN gun sight. Which has got me killed enough times to make me stop using it 99% of the time.”
I am trying to use the MILAN and see if that is the issue. I used to be able to shoot over concrete barriers, but then I suddenly stopped being able to do so at some point.
Cos i think it requires the gun sight to be visible for some reason
Ah, well it’s hard to say. I haven’t played the Warrior in quite a while even though I like it. Been busy spading other things and then the Fox came out.
I do know that ATGMs in general have undergone a series of changes lately and not all of them were well received.
Because unlike in other IFV, Warrior in game has the “command giver” to the missile placed not in the launcher, but in the gunner sight. Why they did that, i dont know.
Cool. So a pretty much unusable ATGM for Peekaboo on stupid Ping. Sniping might be doable, but much barge much wow.
Thank you for that info (there is the guidance right next to the tube FFS).
Time for more gun kills. Yay.
Again its been a while since I played the Warrior but is there an option to aim from the missile sight instead of the gun sight?
As for the recalculation something else to consider is that the RARDEN is supposed to use 6 round magazines but in the Fox it uses 3 round magazines so we might see that changed.
Yes, but Gaijin placed the missile “command giver” not on the launcher, but on the gunner sight, so you cant do things with it.
Should be here
its somewhere here
No, unfortunately.
2x 3 round magazines. But in game it fires nonstop. But roughly has the same amount of time it would reasonably take someone to load the other 3 rounds after the first 3.
Probably just oversight because:
After all, part of why I like the Warrior is that its plucky and trying its best.
Yea in practical terms it really doesn’t make a difference if its 1x6 or 2x3 given the sustainable fire rate.
6 is a burst mode, that requires handcranking the gun after that, the 3 reload 3 simulates puting a new clip inside to maintain automatic fire
Paul Harrell (may he rest in peace) would be proud.
Maybe they’re using the older ammunition for the Fox, instead of newer?
Yeah the Rarden acts almost as if it’s a 76mm with shrapnel for some reason. Kinda hilarious 1 tapping most tanks on accident.
More likely instead of modeling the RARDEN ammo based upon IRL data. They’ll model it via the Gaijin calculator which will nerf it through the floor.
Wasnt an issue for the Warrior because its one of the worst IFVs in game, but god-forbid Britain has a usable ground vehicle, its against the ToS
I think that’s a skill issue. I actually don’t mind 75% of the Brit vehicles. Especially the Sherman with what the 17lbs gun? Might only fire AP, but kills anything easily. The centurions are all good, etc, etc. the tortoise might be… meh? I have no idea. APDS in the turtle must be nice, but since APHE changes didn’t happen, the turtle suffers still.
IvanBoo still having a fit over his skill issue regarding the Fox?
Lol. Lmfao.
I don’t even remember the last time I died to a Fox. They aren’t hard to deal with.
That’s because you play USA mostly, and I already made a comment on that… but hey, say more things to make yourself look even more ignorant.
Maybe you should take up reading sometime? It’s good for the brain, especially a US brain.
Inb4 gaijin found the secret documents of an APFSDS round for the RARDEN and we see both vehicles going to 9.0 xD
(the memes of the modified 30x173 APFSDS Rheinmetall round from like, 15 years ago, a man can dream)
Don’t have high hopes.
All this hazze. Its pretty much obvious that you can’t put up these high pen and very mobile autocannon recon vehicles vs. WW2 and early cold war stuff.
Up its BR ffs. How hard is it? Let is fight vs. BMDs and BMP-2 etc. etc. Whats the point of releasing hell vs. Tigers etc? Whose idea was it in the first place this would be even remotely fair?